Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i've done a compression and leak down test on my rb26 to see if i can determine why it burns about a qt of oil between changes (5000Kms)

Ive somewhat ruled out valve seals because it doesnt smoke on start up even after sitting for some days, neither on deceleration, neither on idle.

There is slight white/blue on hard accel but i cannot see it in from inside the car....i was told this by a friend driving behind.

It fills the catch can with less than a table spoon of oil during the period also.

Anyway here are the results...

...Compression________________Leak down

....DRY........WET____________DRY...........WET

1) 155.........200 __________1) 12%..........10%

2) 151.........200___________2) 8%...........7%

3) 160.........205___________3) 10%.........10%

4) 157.........200___________4) 11%.........11%

5) 145.........190___________5) 15%.........14%

6) 152.........198___________6) 20%.........14%

Did not hear any air escaping through the intake,exhaust,through the coolant etc, only through the dip stick hole and the oil fill cover...about the same amount for all cylinders

So what do u guys think Rings or turbos or....???

Yeah I thought that might have been the case.

It would show different symptoms usually for turbo, as you have mentioned. It would more than likely get smoke on startup after leaving it overnight. Which would lead you to either stem seals or turbo, but the test there pretty much points to rings for me anyway, that will be the smoke under acceleration too.

Did you perform your own comp test prior to purchasing? How long have you had it for?

I started the engine when it was on the ground and did a comp test, no. 5 was a little lower that the rest...same as it is now, and then did a next test after about 5-6mths of running in the car and it was more or less the same....just 1-2psi difference

I used a different gauge this time tho so i cant compare it to the last results, and it has been about another 6mths since the last test.

Going from the difference between the wet and dry test on no. 6 it points to rings, but is that difference so bad??? ie. from 20% to 14%.....

I would of thought there might have been a larger difference in leak down between wet and dry on no. 5 seeing that it had the lowest comp.

The car still makes good power tho.

Yeah I know what your saying re no 5, I would have expected a different result there.

Maybe take it to a reputable garage and have another test done, can't hurt having another set of results to compare with. Should cost sub $100, and you can then get another opinion as well. Was the test performed at WOT?

Personally I think your looking at combined blow by across all cylinders. Not anything major, but enough to cause that amount of oil loss over x period of time. In any event, whether it's one cylinder, 2, or all of them, the end result is the same, it will need a rebuild in order to resolve it.

If it's making good power and still pulls strong, then leave it for a bit longer and just watch your oil.

You could even investigate running a different grade oil in order to minimize it.

Don't mind getting a second opinion at all but there is no one locally to do it that's why i had to buy my own equipment to do it!

Its a cheap gauge from harbor freight in the states though, so i dont know how accurate it is......did each test about four times though to ensure a consistent result!

The comp test seems more or less ok for a rb with some ks on it....just no. 5 is a little lower but yet doesn't show any improvement in leak down when it was done wet.

Oil control rings was suggested as a probable cause but neither a comp test nor leak down would determine this right???

Test was done wot on a warm motor using redline 20w50

Yeh....

I got one of those small greddy copy catch can filled with copper scuff pad thingy with one 1/2" hose from the cam covers running to it then back to original spot on the rear turbo

Is it possible that the 1/2" hose is too small??

The rest of the pcv system is stock.

I dont think there excessive pressure in the sump tho....It does not blow out the dipstick and it isnt on that tight

  • 4 weeks later...

2 things to try:

Cold comp test (not on a warmed up motor)

Comp test with a cap full of oil down the cylinder (also cold)

Doing it cold may show you less impressive results, and major variances in the results from a cap full of oil in the bore shows worn rings.

Perhaps remove your front pipe and look for evidence of a greasy burn, all turbos with worn seals have been a little greasy in the exhaust housing that I have worked on.

Realistically you are going to have to make your own decision here.. Another thing to note, is your breather setup stock (I noted you said you had a catch can) and how is it setup.

Unfortunately these things are not as simply diagnosed as they are said, GL.

Do the plugs show any signs that it's burning oil?

Just to make sure....If its burning oil what color will the plugs be??

Also going by the comp and leak down results is ok for me to rule out the bottom end as the problem or is it still possible for it to have good comp and oil getting past bad oil control rings and being burnt???

2 things to try:

Cold comp test (not on a warmed up motor)

Comp test with a cap full of oil down the cylinder (also cold)

Doing it cold may show you less impressive results, and major variances in the results from a cap full of oil in the bore shows worn rings.

With regards to the cap of oil, isn't that what the "wet" and "dry" readings referred to?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...