Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I'm working on some stuff at work at the moment and we have a very interesting need for some specialised equipment we are building.

We are building some ICT gear that will stream a live feed via a wireless internet card back to a command centre to get real time video information (GPS tagged as well for live map plotting). I need some help working out how to get the footage onto a laptop. I have a number of large vendors working on this with me at the moment and we are all finding its a tad challenging, to the point that some of the larger vendors may have to build something for me. But I want to think outside of the box, hence I figured I post here :( With everyone's video and photo knowledge I'm hoping someone as some ideas!

Requirements:

Highly mobile

Will be going up in light aircraft, can not be permanently fixed

High optical zoom (digital zoom is no good)

Image Stabilization

Must have a simple way to connect to the laptop (ie 1 cable if possible)

What we have got:

Single handy cam, AV out to a USB AV Capture device which the software picks up the feed from - has too many cables and is just messy

2.4ghz encrypted wireless system, works well until you get into buildings or in aircraft - so wireless is out for the moment

Suggestions so far:

USB Web Camera mode available on HandyCams - This was a great idea but new cameras don't have that feature anymore as there was no market drive for it

FireWire Cable to PCMCIA card - this is a possible, but again a lot of Handy Cams are dropping firewire now and i want to keep the PCMCIA card slots free if possible

I'm looking at DSLR's as an option as they have fantastic image stabilization now and a wide selection of lenses, but I still need a way to get a live feed back, AV should work but is not better than what we already have.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/321953-very-unique-need/
Share on other sites

hey matt,

yeah I'm doing some digging now, I use canons which have similar features but they all seem to need their custom software, which makes the time frame blow out as i need to have more software written to talk to it. Easier if I can find something that gets picked up by a windows native drivers OR just has a driver set I can use.

I haven't given up on the canons though, just trying to find the drivers. Anyone with Nikon's that can comment on the actual practical use?

Yep, as you've previously mentioned, Canons can do "tethered shooting" while plugged into a laptop or desktop computer. Could you not use this software linked to an external GPS plotter in conjunction with one of the newer D-SLRs with video function built-in? One USB cable and a fully charged camera battery should serve a few hours, right?

And why not just record data to a memory card then transfer later? Does it have to be recorded "live" to the laptop? (I'm just asking, as I'm not sure what the purpose of your set-up will be).

Things like optical zoom range, small size/lightness of weight, etc. *might* be addressed in this article: http://www.digitalrev.com/en/the-dslr-vide...24-article.html

yeah its a tricky one, yes it has to be live streamed as the footage is viewed in real time back at a command centre to make strategic decisions on asset deployment. The footage is recorded both on the laptop and back at the command centre for later viewing if needed though.

The gps is covered, we are using a seperate GPS that the software will pick up, its the video feed that I just have to worry about now. Battery life shouldn't be an issue, a couple of hours run time would be fine, and they usually take 3 or 4 batteries with them anyway for prolonged deployments.

I've been playing around with the canon stuff, but it seems to only get live view through the EOS utility, and can only take single photos, not video through it. The trick is I need the software we use to pick it up as a 'camera' that is installed on the laptop, the EOS utility doesn't look like it will let me do that (I have a 500D, which does video but won't record on the PC).

- Just had a look at that article, very interesting read. At the end of the day though i won't be sending high def down the line (NextG services won't handle it by a long shot), we currently use handcams, but a DSLR might offer us a much better zoom range and image stabilization which would be a big gain in its own right.

i've been looking at security camera stuff, from what I can see, a lot of them don't have great lens capabilities in terms of zoom (stablisation is also a problem), and getting a connection to them is also fun. A lot of the are IP based which may be doable, but not a lot of USB types.

I agree, there has to be something around but I'm coming up blank a lot of areas I look.

I'm open to all ideas though, I just tried my DSLR through the system and it certainly worked, but auto focus had to be done by a seperate button, not a deal breaker but still had the issue of connection (was just testing through the AV connection)

I've been playing around with the canon stuff, but it seems to only get live view through the EOS utility, and can only take single photos, not video through it. The trick is I need the software we use to pick it up as a 'camera' that is installed on the laptop, the EOS utility doesn't look like it will let me do that (I have a 500D, which does video but won't record on the PC).

Maybe check if the newer Canon cameras will do video feed via the EOS utility - like the 550D or the 7D? Ring around, ask a few established camera shops, etc.

RC pilots have been experimenting with this for a while - known as first person viewing flying (FPV).

FPV Video Pilot Home

Have a look around there. In order to set up a rig, I'd imagine you'd need to build a custom lens (for the optical zoom) and perhaps a remote platform so you can control x-y coordinate tracking of the picture. I think you'd be better off transmitting the analog video signal rather than trying to convert it to digital. It is easier to modulate and receive analog than digital unless you are willing to invest big bucks in the hardware.

Good luck with the project - post your results if you can.

hey, certainly will post results :)

$$$ isn't a concern at this stage, just need to deliver a solution :)

website is very interesting (used to do a lot of R/C flying!), going have a close look at it hehe. We already have access to UAV gear as a whole, so we are already covered in that space. The role of these kits is also to have a 'presence' in the sky with a person behind the camera to pick up on things in the field (and this will turn out cheaper than the UAV gear in the short term). Reason we are going to a digital signal is simply because we need to transmit over the 3g network at the moment so its got to go digital anyway. We are using analog capture devices at the moment which are clunky and not too reliable.

I'm actually toying with the idea of using SLR lenses, attached to a lens adaptor that is fitted to a high end web cam (good quality sensor) and running it that way.

I've got my feelers out to having a look at the EOS utilities for later camera revisions to thanks goldzilla ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...