Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I'm working on some stuff at work at the moment and we have a very interesting need for some specialised equipment we are building.

We are building some ICT gear that will stream a live feed via a wireless internet card back to a command centre to get real time video information (GPS tagged as well for live map plotting). I need some help working out how to get the footage onto a laptop. I have a number of large vendors working on this with me at the moment and we are all finding its a tad challenging, to the point that some of the larger vendors may have to build something for me. But I want to think outside of the box, hence I figured I post here :( With everyone's video and photo knowledge I'm hoping someone as some ideas!

Requirements:

Highly mobile

Will be going up in light aircraft, can not be permanently fixed

High optical zoom (digital zoom is no good)

Image Stabilization

Must have a simple way to connect to the laptop (ie 1 cable if possible)

What we have got:

Single handy cam, AV out to a USB AV Capture device which the software picks up the feed from - has too many cables and is just messy

2.4ghz encrypted wireless system, works well until you get into buildings or in aircraft - so wireless is out for the moment

Suggestions so far:

USB Web Camera mode available on HandyCams - This was a great idea but new cameras don't have that feature anymore as there was no market drive for it

FireWire Cable to PCMCIA card - this is a possible, but again a lot of Handy Cams are dropping firewire now and i want to keep the PCMCIA card slots free if possible

I'm looking at DSLR's as an option as they have fantastic image stabilization now and a wide selection of lenses, but I still need a way to get a live feed back, AV should work but is not better than what we already have.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/321953-very-unique-need/
Share on other sites

hey matt,

yeah I'm doing some digging now, I use canons which have similar features but they all seem to need their custom software, which makes the time frame blow out as i need to have more software written to talk to it. Easier if I can find something that gets picked up by a windows native drivers OR just has a driver set I can use.

I haven't given up on the canons though, just trying to find the drivers. Anyone with Nikon's that can comment on the actual practical use?

Yep, as you've previously mentioned, Canons can do "tethered shooting" while plugged into a laptop or desktop computer. Could you not use this software linked to an external GPS plotter in conjunction with one of the newer D-SLRs with video function built-in? One USB cable and a fully charged camera battery should serve a few hours, right?

And why not just record data to a memory card then transfer later? Does it have to be recorded "live" to the laptop? (I'm just asking, as I'm not sure what the purpose of your set-up will be).

Things like optical zoom range, small size/lightness of weight, etc. *might* be addressed in this article: http://www.digitalrev.com/en/the-dslr-vide...24-article.html

yeah its a tricky one, yes it has to be live streamed as the footage is viewed in real time back at a command centre to make strategic decisions on asset deployment. The footage is recorded both on the laptop and back at the command centre for later viewing if needed though.

The gps is covered, we are using a seperate GPS that the software will pick up, its the video feed that I just have to worry about now. Battery life shouldn't be an issue, a couple of hours run time would be fine, and they usually take 3 or 4 batteries with them anyway for prolonged deployments.

I've been playing around with the canon stuff, but it seems to only get live view through the EOS utility, and can only take single photos, not video through it. The trick is I need the software we use to pick it up as a 'camera' that is installed on the laptop, the EOS utility doesn't look like it will let me do that (I have a 500D, which does video but won't record on the PC).

- Just had a look at that article, very interesting read. At the end of the day though i won't be sending high def down the line (NextG services won't handle it by a long shot), we currently use handcams, but a DSLR might offer us a much better zoom range and image stabilization which would be a big gain in its own right.

i've been looking at security camera stuff, from what I can see, a lot of them don't have great lens capabilities in terms of zoom (stablisation is also a problem), and getting a connection to them is also fun. A lot of the are IP based which may be doable, but not a lot of USB types.

I agree, there has to be something around but I'm coming up blank a lot of areas I look.

I'm open to all ideas though, I just tried my DSLR through the system and it certainly worked, but auto focus had to be done by a seperate button, not a deal breaker but still had the issue of connection (was just testing through the AV connection)

I've been playing around with the canon stuff, but it seems to only get live view through the EOS utility, and can only take single photos, not video through it. The trick is I need the software we use to pick it up as a 'camera' that is installed on the laptop, the EOS utility doesn't look like it will let me do that (I have a 500D, which does video but won't record on the PC).

Maybe check if the newer Canon cameras will do video feed via the EOS utility - like the 550D or the 7D? Ring around, ask a few established camera shops, etc.

RC pilots have been experimenting with this for a while - known as first person viewing flying (FPV).

FPV Video Pilot Home

Have a look around there. In order to set up a rig, I'd imagine you'd need to build a custom lens (for the optical zoom) and perhaps a remote platform so you can control x-y coordinate tracking of the picture. I think you'd be better off transmitting the analog video signal rather than trying to convert it to digital. It is easier to modulate and receive analog than digital unless you are willing to invest big bucks in the hardware.

Good luck with the project - post your results if you can.

hey, certainly will post results :)

$$$ isn't a concern at this stage, just need to deliver a solution :)

website is very interesting (used to do a lot of R/C flying!), going have a close look at it hehe. We already have access to UAV gear as a whole, so we are already covered in that space. The role of these kits is also to have a 'presence' in the sky with a person behind the camera to pick up on things in the field (and this will turn out cheaper than the UAV gear in the short term). Reason we are going to a digital signal is simply because we need to transmit over the 3g network at the moment so its got to go digital anyway. We are using analog capture devices at the moment which are clunky and not too reliable.

I'm actually toying with the idea of using SLR lenses, attached to a lens adaptor that is fitted to a high end web cam (good quality sensor) and running it that way.

I've got my feelers out to having a look at the EOS utilities for later camera revisions to thanks goldzilla ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...