Jump to content
SAU Community

I wasnt going to tell you all...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

lol no way im spending that much money on a car and getting 3rd party

i'll see how much insurance on an S15 will be cause theres one for sale in SA at the moment that looks smick for 32 or something.

dude, i'm going to solve alllllll your problems. If you want to spend $45K, get a R33 GTR VSpec and look yourself up a company called 'Prosperion' - When i was 19 a few months ago insurance would cost me $1600 p/a. I'm 20 now, but it's still the same. Full Comp. They are more than just insurance but as long as you've got a job that isn't at ANZ (which is my prob, but i'm getting around that) you can get an f*cking car you want!!! No more of this mini madness!! I can get ur ass in an E36 M3 if ya want to!

Don't spend $45K. Get a R34 GT-T, you can get those for less than $30K now imported, like $27-28K - Cheap insurance, newish car and step to the almighty R later!!

ooh yeah, duff man!!

well the catch is that you have to finance the whole car running costs with them. They budget out what you think u'll spend for the whole year, than divide it by 12 or 52, i forget. So with some things you are paying before you normally would, say your tyre allowance, but other things like insurance, have been chopped up nicely for u so u don't have to pay in one big chunk. U get a shell petrol card with a discount, and i think can only go to shell. But in the end, throwing all ur running costs together makes it cheaper overall. www.prosperion.com.au - i've gotta give em a call again, just to double check on everything, cos it's starting to look like R34 GT-T time again, 99% sure.

oh, should have mentioned, car can't be over 8 years old. As much as i know about them, that's the catch! :P That's why i said R34 or R33 VSpec.... ooo oooo, or .............. now you can't disagree with this next one....

........

ready..

......

Series 8 RX-7!!!!!!!! Mid $30K's now, about the only good thing to come from SEVS. PURE SEX!!!!!

i reckon, if you give these guys a call, and there aren't any problems (my prob was cos i worked at ANZ) don't worry about S15's or R34's - Either go 'R' or S8 RX-7 - THE sexiest car on the road bar none! Imagine one of those lowered with 18's! :drooling: Talking, 1999 cars, or newer, and mid to high $30K's - tasty!! :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...