Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello can somone tell me what the tourqe setting is for conrods-- fsm is 15nm then 60 degrees, thats a crap way of doing it, fair enuff on head bolts but. bit risky on rods. some say 40ftp on mains and same on rods,, 40ft pound? is alot for rods. anyone?

its holding me up in my rebuild. thanks guys

Factory rod bolts and main bolts 50nm for both.

FSM says torque in kg/cm2 or something....nothing about 60 degrees.

If you have aftermarket rod bolts/rods or main studs then these settings will be different

cool thanks. seems to be alot for the rod bolts tho? this is what i have in fsm---14-16NOm (1.4-1.6kg-m) mark with white marker and turn 60-65 degrees. ??? told have to turn in degrees as bolts tend to strech a bit.. i was going to tighten to say 20ft pd,, but u think 50 ftpnd. can i ask how u got tht,different manuals?

Factory rod bolts and main bolts 50nm for both.

FSM says torque in kg/cm2 or something....nothing about 60 degrees.

If you have aftermarket rod bolts/rods or main studs then these settings will be different

when you have the torque wrench in your hand and and you click 50nm onto that rod bolt, tell me then that you think it feels like too much. I reckon it feels like not enough. But it's not a matter of how many nm or ft/lb required, it all comes down to bolt stretch. If you have a stretch gauge, torque them down til you see 0.006 stretch and that will be spot on.

sounds bloody good to me, ill go and finish her off. . all my other motors,long as theres bit of movent all good, ill let no how they feel .

Also I have run this on two RB25 engines that still used factory rods and bolts and they are both over 80,000k old without issues

yes thats tru. they do lock once load has been applyed ,started. so it should be 36ft p

thts good because i done big ends at 35ftp

when you have the torque wrench in your hand and and you click 50nm onto that rod bolt, tell me then that you think it feels like too much. I reckon it feels like not enough. But it's not a matter of how many nm or ft/lb required, it all comes down to bolt stretch. If you have a stretch gauge, torque them down til you see 0.006 stretch and that will be spot on.
Edited by cuztomr33

yes i have built diesels to 202's to sr20's.few other types,plus bikes 38models to 2000.

when i said movement i ment, once tight, you should be able to still move rod foward and back a bit. all good sumps on.

What do you mean by movement, torquing the rod bolt shouldnt effect bearing clearance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...