Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Im currently in the progress of building a r32 gts-t with a rb25/30 and while im waiting around I've been thinking of a few ideas. I have a r33 rear cradle spare so I'm going to machine up some offset bushes to fit it into the r32 gts-t.

Im considering making some custom rear traction rods, and toe rods. They look simple enough. Im just asking if anyone has some aftermarket arms laying around, for a r33/s14/s15 if you could please get some photos of the arms with a ruler beside it, or if you could please measure up the lenghs of everything and post it pretty please :)

I have found these rose joints on ebay for cheap. They have a female thread, and the usual arms you buy have male but I think the female would be a better way to go. I can get LH and RH threaded ones. Im also after a size of the thread on these, as the largest I can find is 14mm

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/M14-Female-RH-Rose-...=item587dd0cfbb

Also if someone could tell me which threads are LH and RH.

Thanks a million for any help, and discussion is welcomed

post-39806-1278156289_thumb.jpg

post-39806-1278156293_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/327371-custom-make-suspension-arms/
Share on other sites

Well.. I was just thinking, if I have 25mm OD tube, with 3mm wall thickness, I could tap the internal bore out to M20x1.5 or M22x2.5 and get a 20mm/22mm male rose joint to suit.

But if I used a female rose joint I could machine a 1" thread on the outside of the tube and use a 1" (25.4mm) female rose joint

Just a thought anyways.. and as for Mackay having a dealership I will try calling SKF bearing supplies before I buy anything, they sell rosejoints, I will just have to enquire if they're suitable for automotive

I used stainless rose joints for some swaybar linkages, they lasted a while but the weather eventually got to them. Is this for a track car? If not, they will need protection. Notice the ebay ones you posted have a rubber contact seal.

My view on threads is that machined threads are quite a bad design- they are weak as they act as a stress raiser. Rolled threads (ie, male rose joints) are much stronger as the metal (usually heat treated) is compressed and the groove is not a sharp cut. In a suspension application that you want to not have fail this is somewhere I would only use quality rolled threads in this application. I would make an exception if the part was lathe cut on a large diameter (larger than any available die) with enough thread engagement to spread the load, and with the design of the part putting the thread outside the main load-bearing diameter.

Also if you use 4130, 4140 or 4340 they are harder steels and much more notch sensitive, you need to take even more care to eliminate stress raisers from the design.

I've heard mostly that stainless on teflon lined bearings are best for auto application- also heard that with the teflon ones it's preferable not to use rubber seals. I think you'll find that most race car series rod ends are imperial in measurement. Here's a (place down the road from me) website- www.sesgroup.com.au - there's a list of what sort of load rating each size has. (the race car series are stainless on teflon, and male threaded)

Edited by doo doo
But if I used a female rose joint I could machine a 1" thread on the outside of the tube and use a 1" (25.4mm) female rose joint

That is a horrible idea, stick to what works. With a 1" thread you wont have much wall thickness left on your tube (if it is 3mm) also the ball joint will be huge.

To start with of from an engineering point of view you have to ask about design and rod ends you probably shouldn't be playing around with it.

Don't buy cheap rod ends!!!!! Use ONLY good quality teflon/stainless end at least. Teflon/4130 end are available as well.

They can be bought metric but imperial are easier to source and more widely used

3/4unf MALE joints are what you should be using for any lower control arm and 5/8 unf for most other things.

Do not ever cut a thread into a control arm and screw the rod end into it directly. Biggest no no of all. Machine up a sleeve that is a neat interferance fit into the tube and leave a step atleast half the length of your rod end length. Drill and tap the thread into your sleeve then weld the sleeve into the control arm. Allows a far greater wall thickness of the threaded section and a smaller wall thickness tube to be used For the arm.

For the outters don't use rose joint ends. Use spherical bearings and machine up a sleeve with a circlip groove to retain them. Spericals in a sleeve are far stronger for a single application ( you have two inners and one outter on a lower arm for example) and it allows the arms end to penetrate into the sleeve ad be welded far better

I use 1inch 4130 for pretty much everything except front lower arms.

To start with of from an engineering point of view you have to ask about design and rod ends you probably shouldn't be playing around with it.

Don't buy cheap rod ends!!!!! Use ONLY good quality teflon/stainless end at least. Teflon/4130 end are available as well.

They can be bought metric but imperial are easier to source and more widely used

3/4unf MALE joints are what you should be using for any lower control arm and 5/8 unf for most other things.

Do not ever cut a thread into a control arm and screw the rod end into it directly. Biggest no no of all. Machine up a sleeve that is a neat interferance fit into the tube and leave a step atleast half the length of your rod end length. Drill and tap the thread into your sleeve then weld the sleeve into the control arm. Allows a far greater wall thickness of the threaded section and a smaller wall thickness tube to be used For the arm.

For the outters don't use rose joint ends. Use spherical bearings and machine up a sleeve with a circlip groove to retain them. Spericals in a sleeve are far stronger for a single application ( you have two inners and one outter on a lower arm for example) and it allows the arms end to penetrate into the sleeve ad be welded far better

I use 1inch 4130 for pretty much everything except front lower arms.

I would also add don't forget to fishmouth the tube where the sleeve is welded in so you don't get a heat affected zone all in one tension/compression plane. If 4130 is welded stress relieving would be beneficial, even for 3mm thick tube IMO (plus using 4130 filler rod or oxweld #32 rod)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...