Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I need new rear tyres for my 32 gtr. Currently have some dunlop dz101 at 265 40 17. Im finding it a little hard to source some tyres in that size, and have been quoted upto a ridiculous 600 a tyre.

If i were to put a 255 40 17 on the rears, with the 265 40 17 on the front would this have an effect on the 4wd system?

Since the rears would be stretched in effect they would have a smaller diameter and cause attessa to kick in?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328191-32-gtr-tyres-and-attessa/
Share on other sites

I need new rear tyres for my 32 gtr. Currently have some dunlop dz101 at 265 40 17. Im finding it a little hard to source some tyres in that size, and have been quoted upto a ridiculous 600 a tyre.

If i were to put a 255 40 17 on the rears, with the 265 40 17 on the front would this have an effect on the 4wd system?

Since the rears would be stretched in effect they would have a smaller diameter and cause attessa to kick in?

Hey mate,

Run a search in this section of the forum as this particular problem has been covered a number of times.

As far as I am aware it is the actual rolling diameter of the wheel and tyre that is important for the ATTESSA ETS system.

So having variance between front and rear diameters has been known to cause the ATTESSA ETS to behave in some pretty strage ways, like I said, do a search.

Cheers,

Mitch.

thanks for that.

Did a search, seems to have answered my question. Attesa will tolerate up to 3% diameter difference.

Based on this caculator http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp and factoring in the wear on the fronts i think i might be able to get away with fitting the 255 40 17.

If not i have a 4d controller, so ill turn if off all together :)

Fitting a narrower tyre on a rim will affect the rolling diameter in 2 ways:

1 - narrower tyre has a smaller sidewall height, therefore smaller overall diameter.

2 - stretching a tyre onto a rim will further decrease the rolling diameter.

i was assuming the above calculator takes that into account, i guess i will find out when i get the 255 fitted

Hey mate,

Do you really think it's worth chancing it ?

Realistically you could be looking at buying another 2 tyres anyway which means your not really saving any money, obviously it's totally up to you but you might just be better off buying 4 tyres of the same type and selling off your other two :)

i was contemplating doing that elk. I was under the impression that it would still cause problems with the 4wd if the rears are larger than the fronts or vice versa.

And if they do cause big problems, ill chuck it in rwd and use them for mad skids :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...