Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeh weve learnt over the last 5 years of in/outs its just easier to disconnect everything and just take motor/gbox out in one hit. Do what you need to do, then chuck it back in!

Comment about your piston choice mate. Your going for higher comps to help response? Weve run both cp's flat top and domes and its makes bugger all difference. What does make the difference is manifold choices. Or so we found when at the track.

On a road car running 9:1 might be well and good, but for 95% of the time whilst on the race track you never fall off boost so much that you would really need that extra comp to help get you back on. Whilst racing you more then likely wont notice the difference. I couldnt.

Yeah i also find all this talk lately about high CR combo's being more responsive etc. is more theory than anything. Ive owned several VL turbo's both standard and hi-comp conversions with neither being superior than the other unless camshaft profiles and manifolding differences were brought into play. The bore and stroke still stay the same so swept volume doesnt change just the space its compressed into. The engine has to work slightly more to compress the mixture and does receive a slightly larger increase in velocity when exiting the exhaust port. If the supporting hardware is not inplace to support this small increase its lost before it reaches the turbine housing. This small advantage is negated as soon as boost comes into play as the air is forced into the cylinder not drawn in under vacuum. Id rather search for a little headroom in CR so on a hot day if tunes a little off or fuel quality is down the engine doesn't get a hard time. Id say driving an identical car with an 8.0:1 or a 9.0:1 the seat of the pants dyno would be hard pressed to tell any difference and in some cases would actually think the low CR car is the high CR if the placebo effect was introduced.

Edited by Supa Steve

you cant lower CR to allow for a bad tune. if theres too much timing it'll knock regardless. the only solution for that is to get it tuned properly

under light load with the same timing map a higher CR motor will be more responsive

point taken. i have done a lot of research and talking to people over past week including people who have rb30det with lower CR and i feel that staying close to the 9:1 ratio will suit my application. i guess time will soon tell. so you have played around with a few different exhaust manifolds to get the correct result?

I didnt mean to be negative about your choice if it came across that way. Just wanted to share my exp with the matter. It maybe me, but on the track I couldnt tell the difference. The other possible issue is if you run bigger cams with more lift, you just need to be aware of your piston to valve clearance. We had the 9:1 CPs,1.2mm HG and 10.2mm lift and we were around .120" or slightly less.

We went from a gcg china exhaust manifold that cracked after every second race meet to a 6boost mani and we picked up something like 300rpm spool and made more power on the same boost. But we also tried greddy inlet manifold and currently have a plasmaman and we picked up abit of down low power from the that switch. It was the manifold changes that I felt made the most difference, atleast on the dyno and on the track in comparison to the slightly higher CR. Lol at the moment we are just about to switch over to a gtr inlet/throttle bodies. So we will be able to see what difference that may make too.

But everyone is different, you or others may notice things I dont or cant. When your done and out racing you will be able to see for yourself. At the end of the day so long as you make the power you want and you get the response your chasing thats all that counts. Doesnt really matter how you get it! Hopefully it will be enough to help you win!

you didnt come accross negative at all r33_racer. All the input i can get is very helpful. Ive only owned imports as street cars previously and much of my racing experience is go karts and a couple of track days.

Your right in suggesting that it doesnt matter how i get my power as long as i get it. Many suggested running lower cr and that way allows more room for timing and more boost.

But on the same note just as many people say stay at around the 9:1 mark because im not planning on heading past about 17 psi and not planning on dialing a pile of timing into it.

engine is partway through the build. gone with the aries 10cc dome top. at 0 deck with 1.2 head gasket they should give close enough to 9:1 which i what ive been trying to stay close to through my research and build.

james_03 did u nip 0.8 off the deck because it needed it (ie. the face was damaged) or simply to lift ur CR ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...