Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now that my Skyline's gone I'm cleaning out my parts bin so have a few goodies for sale. These are all for R33 GTST and Stagea RB25DET models.

Silicone Inlet Pipe - Brand new, never fitted. Price: $120

BEE*R RSR Front pipe, 80mm diameter, mandrel bent, stainles steel, bolts up to your standard dump pipe and cat converter but I'd recommend getting a split dump pipe and 5inch high flow cat if you wanted a nice free flowing exhaust. This item is used but in excellent condion, price: $100

Braided Brake lines - These are brand new, never fitted high quality ADR approved products. They are also direct replacements for your standard brake lines so there's no hassels with fitting them. Price: $180

Rear Strut Bar. Brand new, still in it's wrapping. Price: $80

Whiteline Front Adjustable Camber Bushes. Part#KCA348 Brand new, I never fitted them cos found that my car already had them. Price: $150

Gauge Pod from Mearcat on SAU. Has hole for 52mm gauge, you can also fit shift/warning lights into it below the gauge. Used but in excellent condition. Price: $50

Autometer Sport Comp Air Fuel Gauge - 52mm, used but in excellent condition. Price: $110

post-27414-1279953167_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953201_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953227_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953262_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953284_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953314_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953359_thumb.jpg

post-27414-1279953383_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/330163-r33-bits-for-sale/
Share on other sites

How come you're not selling the pink fluffy dice? Or the twin overhead fox tails?

Cant bear to part with them? I guess they will fit the new car?

There's no way I'm selling the pink fluffy dice! You can always make room for fluffy dice! What the hell are twin overhead fox tails?? Were they a trend back in the 30's or something? :nyaanyaa:

Rear strut brace sold btw.

There's no way I'm selling the pink fluffy dice! You can always make room for fluffy dice! What the hell are twin overhead fox tails?? Were they a trend back in the 30's or something? :nyaanyaa:

Let me introduce you to a classic

THE NEWCASTLE SONG

Bob Hudson

Chorus:

Dont' you ever let a chance go by,

O son of rajab,

Don't you ever let a chance go by.

Yes, up in Newcastle they have very strange mating habits.

All the young women of Newcastle

walk down the main street

which is called Hunter Street

for reasons that will become obvious

later on in the song.

All the young men of Newcastle

drive down Hunter Street

in their hot FJ Holdens

with chrome plated grease nipples

and double reverse

overhead twin cam door handles,

sitting eight abreast in the front seat,

and they lean out of the window

and say real cool things to the sheilas

on the footpath, like 'Aah g'day'.

And every now and then, of course,

one of the young ladies thinks to herself

Ummmm

she thinks

Ummmmm.

Don't you ever let a chance go by, oh son of rajab

Don't you ever let a chance go by

Chorus

Anyway there was this mob of blokes

driving down Hunter Street

in the front seat of the hot FJ

with chrome plated grease nipples

and twin overhead foxtails,

and the coolest of them all,

who got to sit near the window,

was young Norm.

And they pulled up outside

the Parthenon milk bar

and standing outside

the Parthenon was this beautiful looking sheila.

Oooh! Oooh! said young Normie

who'd come top of his class in English,

Ooooh! he said.

So he leaned out of the window,

and he said real, real suave like,

he said G'day.

This nine foot tall Hell's Angel

came out of the Parthenon milk bar,

looked at Norm and said

Arr, what are ya?

Norm said What are you?

Bloke on the footpath said

D'ya want a go, do ya mate, eh?

Norm said Yeah, d'you want a go, mate?

Bloke on the footpath said

Yeah I'll have a go

Norm said

D'you know who you're picking?

The bloke on the footpath said

Nah, who am I picking?

Norm said

You find out

And all of a sudden there was a break in the traffic, <---- Surely you have heard at least that bit before?? (Jayce/Sinister... tell em)

and as any young Newcastle lad knows-

when you're getting monstered

by a nine foot tall Hells Angel

and there's a break in the traffic....

Chorus

Don't you ever let a chance go by, oh son of rajab

Don't you ever let a chance go by

It's sad - but true...

What's really funny is their still cruising the main streets in towns like Newcastle in their holdens (commonwhores) and leaning out the window and say real cool things to the sheilas (Babe's) on the footpath, like 'Aah g'day' (W'sup)

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...