Jump to content
SAU Community

Extreme Torque Split Controller

endless
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
NSNPWR Rising Star

NSNPWR

Posted
Posted

Its not a HKS one, it says, 'Extreme TSC'....you can get them on Ebay, price seems pretty good from what ive seen them sell for....others would argue that theyre worth next to nothing but I think theyre just angry that they didnt have the initiative or know how to make them and sell them....

WYTSKY Veteran

WYTSKY

Posted
Posted

Can vouch for this.

Have it in my car.

If you have a 32 you can hook it up so it has a switch from 2wd-4wd.

But works really well for any case.

Eg: when I had it on 0 on a skid pan the rears were flying all over the place ( was just about on the threads)

For fun I put it up to 8 (out of 10) the rear would barely let go at all, and the handling in the wet is alot better.

The way it works is by tricking the attesa system that the car is slipping out. the car then reacts by putting more power to the front - based on the level you dial in.

gl with the sale.

chef_stagea Grand Master

chef_stagea

Posted
Posted

what about a 32 gtr?

and do these work from the gbox or the ecu (car)

im putting a 32r box in the stag.. wouldnt mind one of these but i know u cannot make a stag gearbox rwd/4wd without dropping the shaft... so unsure if this will be the same case with the gtr box

DAS KAMU Veteran

DAS KAMU

Posted
Posted
what about a 32 gtr?

and do these work from the gbox or the ecu (car)

im putting a 32r box in the stag.. wouldnt mind one of these but i know u cannot make a stag gearbox rwd/4wd without dropping the shaft... so unsure if this will be the same case with the gtr box

you remove the center console and the g-sensor is under there

i have one of these and my mate hooked it up in 10 mins

only 32s can use the rwd mode as far as know (33's 34's in the instructions say dont use the rwd switch)

Rwd is a laugh though in my 32 gtr

best investment to date

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Unscarred711 Enthusiast

Unscarred711

Posted
Posted
will this burn out the transfer case clutches on thevspec 33 gtrs when put in full rwd mode??

What if you just set the TSC on setting #1, wouldnt that save damage to the transfer case while still giving about 95% rear wheel drive?

Is this thing still for sale?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      lol, probably should have read further!
    • R32 TT
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By R32 TT · Posted

      Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...