Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

get an r8.

ive had mercs and beemers and lexus's honestly, there nice but there boring as f**k. i drove a mates 03/4 r8 not that long ago and it fkn hammered.

unless u can afford to buy a propper amg v8 or a v8 or turbo beemer then seriously dont bother

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you only have $25-$30K to spend, why don't you seriously look at a 2door E46 330Ci? I'm looking at a few now in Perth, and i've driven a 5speed manual with all the fruit (tv, gps, leather, sunroof, all elecs bla bla bla) and for a 3L inline6, and being luxury and smooth as silk on the road they are pretty quick.

Put it this way, my 323Ci (2.5L Inline 6) had no probs hitting 200k's, so trust me, a 330Ci has plenty of squirt. And funnily enough, the ecu's in the E46's are "learning" ecu's. So if you hammer it around a bit the ecu will adapt to your driving style and the car will actaully develop slightly more power. And just for anyone reading this, no that is not a load of bullshit....

very high Ks ^^ other than that hmmmm interesting... e34 would be nice too

no holdens and syfon no non "M" bmw's as i said i wanna get something different/rare or just special in a way so that i can sell in 4-5 years time and still get some money from it... although i'll admit E46 330Ci is good value, will definately keep it in mind cheers

hey Ten Four whats the difference between an "evo" m3 and a normal m3?

Edited by R-SPEC

Non-Evo:

3L inline 6

Power 210kW @ 7000rpm (281hp)

Torque 320Nm @ 3600rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h 6.0

Fuel Urban (l/100km) 12.0

Fuel Extra Urban (l/100km) 6.8

Fuel Combined (l/100km) 8.7

Auto/5 Speed Manual

Evo:

3.2l inline 6

Power 236kW @ 7400rpm (325hp)

Torque 350Nm @ 3250rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h (secs) 5.5

Fuel Urban (l/100km) 9.1

Fuel Extra Urban (l/100km) 6.8

Fuel Combined (l/100km) 7.6

SMG (DO NOT BUY)/6 Speed Getrag Manual

For the record, mine made 255rwhp

I saw that M5, kms are a huge put off lol. But still, its a BMW so if its been maintained, it'll last forever.

I originally wanted an E34 M5 but finding a good one is hard, then there are dreamer prices...

Also, had a E39 540i for a while. Black on black, 120kms full books. Sold that for 18.5k but had 2 calls of 20k after I sold it =/ (Made 200rwhp on a low reading dyno in perth, 40deg day)

med_gallery_19_24_387333.jpg

med_gallery_19_24_376215.jpg

Quick fly-by Clicky Linky Had genuine M5 wheels... mhmm expensive

Edited by Ten Four
very high Ks ^^ other than that hmmmm interesting... e34 would be nice too

Erm 205,000 km for a 10 year old car is hardly what I'd call very high.

Possibly higher than desirable for a unique car, but knowing BMW reliability, it's only just run in.

Hot Dam, that thing's just down the road from me - so tempting to go and look at it!!

Ten Four thanks heaps for that info man :worship:

so basically the evos are the later model e36s that came with the 3.2 and 6sp right?

236kw and weighs about the same as a 34 gtt not bad at all. do you know if sunroof was a factory option or they just didnt come with it?

nice 540 btw its just too "family car" spec for my liking

Erm 205,000 km for a 10 year old car is hardly what I'd call very high.

Possibly higher than desirable for a unique car, but knowing BMW reliability, it's only just run in.

Hot Dam, that thing's just down the road from me - so tempting to go and look at it!!

well my 34 is at 115Ks and im stressing that i wont be able to sell it while Ks are still low enough lol i just think anything over 150Ks is "high" but thats just me

go take it for a test drive tell us what we're missing :D

Yeah, later model bigger engine, better box more economical and more torque.

Sunroof was a factory option, as were electric seats.

Hardcore people didnt like electric seats cause they added 50kg apparently (read on M3 forum USA).

Mines got manual adjustable seats and no roof :worship: (Haven't had it weighed though)

Re Kms, yeah mines got 99k miles, about 160k kms but still makes lots of power, smooth etc. (Stock Euro's make about 210-220rwhp)

Theres a bloke on M3 forum USA with 300k miles on his M3 lol. (USA Spec ones are fail.... 3l = 240hp, 3.2l = 240hp, apprently due to emission laws)

Edited by Ten Four

jesus thats almost 500,000Ks hahahaha

sounds good then i think i'll wait for a nice luxo spec to pop up :worship: not really looking at doing any track days so yeah

btw why are you selling it? was it nice to drive did it feel gutless or anything? gotta get me a test drive in one see whats what

thanks dude

Its gutless as fk after a 430rwhp R32 GTR :D

Instant power is awesome though. Its not slow as such, plenty of power and I cruise around down in 5th or 6th doing 1500-2k rpm lol.

Oh yeah, mines got a short shifter too, instant shifts ftw. It is pretty quick still (I topped 260 end of 5th, went into 6th but no more road :)) and the handling of these things are just simply awesome. So neutral with that nice bit of oversteer :)

Selling cause i don't want to uni daily it (worst drivers, dents, sun all day, rack up kms). Ya, impulse buy really :worship: Always wanted one.

Edited by Ten Four

I drove a mates 3.2L with the smg box. He bought it because he can't drive a manual. I've got to say, it's the worst type of gearbox i've ever experienced in my life. How on mighty earth did bmw manage to approve such horrible engineering is beyond me. Perhaps someone can enlighten me.

But the power was nice and smooth, the car felt rock solid and build quality is typical standard of what bmw makes.

^Yes. Drove a 108km full log book one. SMG. What a fail.

Sooooooooooooo slow to change gears. (Not to mention super un-reliability.)

Needless to say I went straight to the manual one for sale and bought that instead...

Edited by Ten Four

if you want it done properly do it yourself :)

with your price range I'm not sure these are the cars you should be looking at, they'll be old and expensive to run.

if it's just gonna break anyway you could probably get an alfa romeo GT :)

or even a series 5 VW GTI. Both cars not exactly amazing in terms of speed, but ok.

a mate keeps telling me to get an alfa gt gotta admit alfa knows how to make some beautiful cars. new 159 in black is evil!

but gotta keep in mind resale values might aswell get a hsv r8 as mentioned before lol

and yes older cars will probably need more attention but one with good service history should be fine

My good friend used to own a 1998 E36 M3 Anniversary edition convertible. Was the 3.2L 6 etc.....all it had was a cat back exhaust and it was making 258hp @ the rear wheels. That pulled a low low 13....

If you are really only going to consider an "M" BMW, then go for an E39 M5, power, luxury, style, everything :(

i was close at getting an e46 m3 but went with the r34 gtr instead after reading a few things and im very happy with my choice :( .

but anyway what i wanted to say is that i did alot of research on m3's and with the smg box are you sure that they just didnt have the shift speed adjusted properly because there are a few different settings you can have and when set to the fastest these things change super fast. not very good if you put it in auto mode though.

also found alot of little tricks you can do with the smg boxes aswell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...