Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So some days my car just feels really quite slow, even if its 10c outside (normally ridiculously fast) it feels doughy with the throttle and it dies in the ass by about 6k as if the ignition has been pulled. Boost rises normally and it revs cleanly with no missing.

Car currently has a 6k rev limit due to standard injectors and afm on an rb25det with gcg highflow running 10-12psi. It is going in for retune in a few weeks but I did a datalog with ecu talk for fun tonight when it was getting slow. Was wondering if someone with some tuning experience could look at it and see if it looks like it is pulling timing? basically its a full throttle run from 2k to 6k. I throttle off at the 5787 point hence the large drop in timing.

20010516.png

Edited by Rolls
  • 2 weeks later...
it almost looks like it goes into a limp mode?

Why is the ignition timing that low that it suggest limp mode? It however does not get rich when I get high in the rev range, also when its fast or slow neither blow black smoke.

I'm replacing the AFM with a Q45 (got it cheap) when I get it tuned so it will rule this out as being the problem. The volts go all the way up to 5.1v when I've been looking at the datalogs so could it just be the AFM maxing out and the ecu pulling timing because of that?

Edited by Rolls
the airflow meter is maxed out = shit timing = get it tuned and dont run it on full throttle = who ever told you to only rev it to 6000 = tard

It has a rev limiter at 6000, it was tuned and the afrs are fine all the way to that 6000rpm redline. It was just a safe get me by tune until I passed inspection and got it regod with the 25 and could fit all the other gear up. The injectors only get to 80% duty cycle so theres more in them still.

So does anyone actually know roughly what sort of timing I should be seeing at 6000rpm on full boost? I'd like to find if its something else thats faulty and replace it before it gets tuned again, don't want to book it in only to have them spot it for me immediately. If it is the AFM though then no big deal.

Edited by Rolls

it looks like the normal rich and retard in the stock ecu when it picks up too much airflow meter load

have you got a non-std ECU or hacked ecu or remapped ecu (ie to remove the std airflow rich and retard)

also Q45 is ass, i wouldnt even bother, sell it and go for a std Z32 and be done with it

proven results time and time again and youll have less hassles and save time/money

I've got a nistune in an R32 ecu running the rb25. Why do you say the Q45 is ass? I haven't got it yet but a mate has a brand new one with plug he was willing to sell for $100, thought it was a better buy than $250 for a Z32.

I've heard it has less resolution than the Z32 but should be fine for a 250kw application. Cheers for the comment though paul, I guess being as the weather is colder now is why it's picking up the RR part of the map when it didn't used to. I'm assuming they only remapped the mid/lower parts of the map that it reached on the dyno and left the low timing/rich bits for safety up top. It doesn't puff black smoke and misfire like the standard RR part of the map though, so they must have pulled some fuel out.

Edited by Rolls

hmm thats odd, im not even sure HR32 ECU has R&R mapping inside it ?

from memory it was only ECR33 ECU that has this feature in it, can anyone confirm?

but thast what it looks like, your AFM peaks near 4.7v and kablammo it drops all the timing on the floor

the Q45 is ok if you only want 250rwkw but for most users its annoying because its bigger, different plug, it's large so you ahve to change pipework, POD etc and caps out well before a normal Z32

hmm thats odd, im not even sure HR32 ECU has R&R mapping inside it ?

from memory it was only ECR33 ECU that has this feature in it, can anyone confirm?

but thast what it looks like, your AFM peaks near 4.7v and kablammo it drops all the timing on the floor

the Q45 is ok if you only want 250rwkw but for most users its annoying because its bigger, different plug, it's large so you ahve to change pipework, POD etc and caps out well before a normal Z32

Well he copied the standard rb25det base map onto it and the modified it, I thought the R&R feature was technically not a feature and just the upper load/rpm points on the fuel/ignition maps where it just dumped fuel and pulled ignition? In some datalogs the AFM voltage gets to 5 - 5.1v so it is definitely maxing out at times.

However my issue is it is pulling power across the board, it is more noticeable around 2-3.5k where it jsut feels like it is making 20kw max then about 4.5-5.5k the power kicks real hard and then dies again by 5800rpm. It wasn't always like this and the turbo is making decent boost by 3k so it isn't a characteristic of the setup.

I realised the Q45 would be annoying but I need a new pod/adaptor anyway, and it comes with a plug to suit so it is only one 90 to 80mm reducer I would need to adapt it, but I might re-consider it as I haven't bought it yet.

Edited by Rolls

yeah so HR32 ECU does not have R&R feature for excess airflow meter load

but it does have factory knock map / low octane penis fuel mapping

when you tuned the car

did you tune the low octane map also

when you log do you see knocking

it souinds like its running well

picks up a fair amount of knocking and reverts to low octane penis fuel map

which is where all your power goes out the window

I personally did not tune the car so I don't know if they touched the low octane map, I doubt they did as it was just a quick safe tune. The knock levels never really went over 30 when I was datalogging, is this considered high?

it does look like knock map

maby dud batch of fuel?

Thought that but have been through 2 tanks of BP premium and 1 of vortex 98 with it being slow about 90% of the time, some days it will random switch maps and absolutely hoot for a few hours, then back it goes.

I guess the only real test will be when it goes on the dyno with all my new bits.

The r32 GTST ecu does have a kind of r&r based on the TP(Load) you are running the last load column in the fuel and ignition map is extremely rich and retarded. There is also a TP(Load) limit map set to 128 as default. this will cut fuel causing total loss of power. The knock maps have nothing to do with the r&r we are talking about they are a fuel map that is very rich on all cells and an ignition map that is retarded on all cells.

Your timing looks pretty normal. This is obviously the timing that Nistune is reporting but have you checked and confirmed with a timing light?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...