Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was just having a chat about f1's and racing and thought would it be possible to use liquid nitrogen to cool a engine with it having some sort of restrictive coating in the engine or some sort. So that it doesnt cool the metal enough to shatter.

cam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/331936-liquid-nitrogen-in-engines/
Share on other sites

little bit of common sense required here

liquid LPG injection systems are available these days- as the LPG is port injected, it changes from a liquid to a vapour, and the change of state of the liquid to a low pressure gas results in a drop in temperature. this also sucks heat out of the combined intake charge in the inlet manifold (latent heat of evaporation). it turns into gas instantly

same would happen with liquid nitrogen. but it wouldn't benefit power, because nitrogen isn't combustible and would merely take up space that could be occupied by oxygen

the reason NOS gives a power increase is because its N20, and during combustion the oxygen molecules are stripped off the compound to massively aid the combustion of the incoming fuel/air charge

sorry if the original post has come across wrong, but i was asking if it could be used to cool the engine not used as a fuel. When i mentioned f1's its purely because they dont have radiators and was thinking if this could be a substitute in any vehicle

who told you F1 cars don't have radiators?

as Mikey Mike said- they do (1 in each sidepod), and they cost ~$50k each

methanol drag cars don't usually have radiators, because the fuel burns very cold, and the cars are only usually running for a short amount of time (not long enough for heat soak to become a problem)

well lets say they some how managed to fill all the cooling channels with liquid nitrogen, as the engine would heat up a extreme amount of pressure would be exerted to the internals of the engine by the liquid nitrogen trying to become a gas = catastrophic failure = very bad.

the only way it could be implemented is by spraying it in a liquid form in front of the radiators and as it becomes a gas will cool the radiators.

and then there are the safety issues for having that much liquid nitrogen on the track, freezing drivers and the anesthetic effect of nitrogen and the chance of a explosion due to the liquid nitrogen heating up

and then the engineering complications. how are you going 2 pump it what will keep the spray tips from freezing, un even cooling will cause the radiator to crack what if a pipe caring liquid nitrogen broke there would need to be a emergency shut of capable of operating in extreme cold, how to store enough liquid nitrogen and how to keep the insulated vessel crash proof

and the added weight would slow the car down making any cooling benefits negligible

i saw a setup in i think it was an off tits turbo vs commodore a few years ago that had a massive esky in the boot filled with liquid nitrogen and the coolant was passed through a heat exchange in the box to cool it down

If you had liquid nitrogen in your engine and it was still a liquid.. im pretty sure your oil would be frozen, since it has a freezing point somewhere around 0 °C , and the liquid nitrogens boiling boint is something like -195 °C, probably would freeze your fuel aswell ;)

I've been looking at water/methanol injection to keep my intake and internal engine temps down :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My 3.8 kW system (when new, not so much nearly 20 yrs later) will do 21 kWh per day (best few months of the year), and that's with an afternoon shading issue. So it really could/should be able to do maybe 24. So a 6.6 kW system probably cannot fill a 40ish kWh battery from scratch, but then it is very unlikely to ever need to. Let's presume that you use 10-15 kWh during the day and stash the rest. So long as the battery isn't drawn down below ~50%, it'll be fine. And that draw down presumes using 20 kWh overnight, which is a reasonably heavy draw. So that seems reasonable. The 40kWh will be good for extended outages, and very bad days where you get almost no generation for a day or two. Might struggle to top it all the way back up after it gets pulled all the way down though. I'd think you'd probably want about 10 kW of panels to make life a little easier, wrt keeping a 40 kWh battery charged. But then....does it really need to be at 100% every day? Probably not.
    • Am I wrong in thinking that there is a hell of a lot of battery storage for a 6.6 feed into it Your battery is around 4 times bigger than the battery that is going into my place in a week, but I have nearly twice the feed Will the batteries actually ever get fully charged? School me on the science bitches   
    • Wow ELVIS. You have an....interesting approach to conversation. Did you not notice that I wasn't talking to you?
    • Hello Liam - HA - somewhere in flies - possibly I have an update, but I have been so busy, projects have taken a back seat to getting business back on track.  I will let you know the outcome, but I think I am going to go for the 8HP,  CHEERS.  ELVIS
    • Thanks Joshuaho96, yes - as someone else also suggested, the 8HP seems the 'smart choice' - HA - and ZERO to do with cost, but I am sure 8 speeds will be better than 6 speeds - HA - maybe.  I will purchase a new 8HP,  Thanks.  ELVIS.
×
×
  • Create New...