Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You all aren't going to believe this

The dealer may not follow through with the deal even though we have paid in full, he now wants more money (after the sale)

see more http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...78#entry5401378

Fine, there are plenty of other track cars around. He just needs to pay for your time, and expenses paid. He'll never successfully sell anything again here.

Similar thing happened to my car, ended up not getting two tyres the guy had agreed to to. And more recently I agreed to pay for an air deflector which they guy then pulled as someone else later offered apparently more. At least I had not paid for it!

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

We are in possession, but I never want to have to go through anything like that ever again.

Thank you all for your words of support. Thank goodness so many know me so well and know the way i operate.

care to share the final outcome?

I love car dealers. the lies they will tell you to your face is amazing. when searching for a car it always worth a laugh to go look in the yards but buy else where haha

one place here in phillip tried to tell me that their black 35 gtr they had on the lot for 160k was a specv. when i said if it is consider it sold as i will be able to on sell it for at least 100k profit he walked away lol

More information will be coming once things get underway. The dealer in question took money from another dealer after I paid for the car in full. The other (innocent victim) dealer had a truck go to pick up our car yesterday morning, but I had already taken possession after having a further $2500 extorted from us to take delivery of a car we had already paid for in full.

I won't say more HERE until legals are completed, but it's not over yet. Myself and the other parties are taking legal and media action until I get my $2500 back. My barrister believes strongly that no judge would rule in the dealers favour after seeing my receipt and contract, and is so confident he will work pro-bono and recover his costs.

Feel free to pm me for updates

Something tells me that you'll need some rubber for it??

*hint hint* :D

Thanks Mick, thats good of you... I needed a sponsor and you need someone to push your tyres around the track :thumbsup:

I am the current NSW Tin Top and Class Champion *hint hint* and Im doing IRACE which is televised on Fox Sport and SBS... just get your people to talk to my people LOL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...