Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nismoid the Garret turbine maps actually show the flow rates of the 0.82 GT30 and the 0.63 GT35 as having similar maximums though IMO the GT30 0.82 is the better map , these are with the T3 flanged GT30 turbine housings BTW because the 30 and 35 both use them .

True, they would be close.

However he wants to chase more power so I'd be dubious as to wether it'll get any better.

Going up 100hp in comp size/flow, but down in turbine housing size... Can be a nasty mix.

25psi is still in a respectable efficiency zone of the 82mm compressor. It's out of the most efficient zone but still ok. Peak flow here is caps out at a touch over (60lb/min) , or almost 600hp before hitting choke.

If you use 90% of that flow then it equates to 440 to 450rwhp (assuming you had a larger engine). With 25psi as you stated you should get 410rwhp.

Can a 0.82A/R turbine flow this 410hp? Perhaps. You should check exhaust gas temps as you raise boost.

You probably won't need a bigger compressor just a bigger turbine (and total flow, so you'll also need a GT35 0.82AR). I'd guess a touch under 10% more lag ~400rpm, since you are only changing the turbine side to ~15% more flow. Why not have a look at the maps using true GT35 (3582) turbos and compare.

Edited by simpletool

thats all very interesting, as we all know the old faithful 20 is not the best choice for power, but ive always wanted

to know just how much a 2o can make when its a built engine, i think the limiting factor will be the valves and ports

buts that when the nitrous will come into play.

do you think i should remove the 26 intake and tb's and go for a longer runner and larger 8omm tb option.

i had never thought about a td series turbo, always thought they were a bit old school with response. maybe a BB TO4Z?

How would my 3040 with a 1.06 rear housing compare to a 3582 with a 0.82 in hp rating and response?

I can handle another 500rpm of lag if it means the possibility of making my power goals.

Edited by boostn32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I was just driving into work and while on my drive, I went to accelerate and noticed the car would sputter/hesitate and I’d hear a few pops from the exhaust before it started going faster. Then I also noticed that when I push my clutch in, the car would die. This all started happening today. Any ideas?
    • That is a lovely Volvo, just saying. Yes I should have got an 260RS when they were cheap. I do regret now.
    • ^ lots of good points made above. The thing is, "aggressive" or "flush" fitment is relative depending on how much you have been influenced by social media. My starting point is always "look at the Nismo RWD specs". That is where you should start, then start measuring as GTSBoy as sort of mentioned, because every car will be slightly different. My 8.5"+35/9.5+38 will not be "flush" enough for you because you want more "pumped" look, which is why you measure. Tyre sizes and brand/models also make a difference. Some tyres are more chunky/square, some are more rounded. That means you could get away with more aggressive offsets without rubbing. But then it also depends on your ride height. Also depends on how much your car copped damage before being shipped from Japan. So it goes back to measuring your car yourself and determining what can work. Those Nismo specs are used bacause it's a safe spec for standard car (suspension. body) with chunky tyres. But then I put 265/35 wide tyres on R34 GT-R wheels, and currently run 285/30 tyres on 18x10 wheels.
    • Sounds pretty awesome. I recommend creating a new build thread and posting all your goodness in there.
×
×
  • Create New...