Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello

Before I asked everyone if I should put a RB25 in my R32 GTS-T. Most people said keep the original engine. I live in Japan(American).

Well I have to change engines anyway. The previous owner of this car put a wide body rear fender kit on the car to make it look like a GTR, he did not register the change. So when next year's inspection and road taxes come, it will change the price of my car's road tax and class and plate series. So I might as well put a 25 in the car. It will cost the same, meaning that for the extra money I have to pay for taxes it will be the same wether I put the 25 in or not.

How do I put the 25 in ?, I mean is there a site that gives tips about what to do when changing engines? There will be people there to help me who know what they are doing but I want to learn as much as possible before I do this. It will not happen until next year early but I want to know what I am doing before I start.

What parts besides the 25 engine, computer, engine wiring harness will I need? Fuel pump needs to be changed?

Any and all info and suggestions about this please give me.

Help please.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Plenty of conversion threads mate - have a bit of a search.

Otherwise its very simple.

Loom, motor, ECU.

If you plan to chase power i would most certainly put a RB25 gearbox in there as well. Not sure whats required for a R32-t tho (i know a HR31 needs crossmember mod).

Fuel pump - well that largely depends, in stock form it should be OK, but wont hurt to change it of course for a couple hundred.

Plenty of conversion threads mate - have a bit of a search.

Otherwise its very simple.

Loom, motor, ECU.

If you plan to chase power i would most certainly put a RB25 gearbox in there as well. Not sure whats required for a R32-t tho (i know a HR31 needs crossmember mod).

Fuel pump - well that largely depends, in stock form it should be OK, but wont hurt to change it of course for a couple hundred.

What about the shaft? Do I have to use one off of a 25? I have to cut it?

Edited by 335
You would still have to re wire the existing loom for the rb25 pin outs and ecu and also probably add some stuff like vct

What if I run the RB25 without VCT? So best to get the wiring harness for the 25?

I wouldnt run without VCT personally.

You can adapt it to the RB20 loom (im dead certain there is a detailed thread somewhere with the wiring info)... but IMO if you have the RB25 loom & motor combo, go down that route and keep the VCT. Its overall a cleaner end result as well

I wouldnt run without VCT personally.

You can adapt it to the RB20 loom (im dead certain there is a detailed thread somewhere with the wiring info)... but IMO if you have the RB25 loom & motor combo, go down that route and keep the VCT. Its overall a cleaner end result as well

+1

I read that some people use the RB20's loom, sensors and computers, coil packs. Is this possible?

You will need to change the TPS to a series 1 R33 unit if you plan to use the rb20 ecu, you will obviously need to remap the computer as well, a nistune is the best option here as it makes retuning the ecu on the dyno very easy.

You will need to change the TPS to a series 1 R33 unit if you plan to use the rb20 ecu, you will obviously need to remap the computer as well, a nistune is the best option here as it makes retuning the ecu on the dyno very easy.

I read through Predators post, long. I think the easiest option is to use the 25 loom but than there are problems with the wipers and ac. Is this easy to fix? I do not know about the wiring on the car. I would be lost unless I had a step by step instructions and also shown what wires are what. What about the Hicas problem? Will it still work since The R33 is electronic Hicas and the R32 is hydraulic?

Will it be easier to use the RB20 loom and wiring? What is a TPS?

My car is a manual. So it said that I would only have to cut the yoke off of the RB 25 tail shaft and weld it onto the RB 20 tail shaft and that is is it for modding the tailshaft? The gear box mounts do line up?

Sorry, learning here.

Personally I would use the rb20 loom and get the computer remapped, sounds easier to me, less sensors need to be swapped over. Sounds like you are going to need an auto electrician and pay them a lot of money if you can't do it yourself though. The only way to do it is to get a copy of both electrical diagrams and figure out what needs to go where.

Personally I would use the rb20 loom and get the computer remapped, sounds easier to me, less sensors need to be swapped over. Sounds like you are going to need an auto electrician and pay them a lot of money if you can't do it yourself though. The only way to do it is to get a copy of both electrical diagrams and figure out what needs to go where.

Where can I get the wiring diagrams from?

I want to hear more about using the RB 25 loom before I decide. I do not want to have trouble down the line if not using RB 25 computer.

Where can I get the wiring diagrams from?

I want to hear more about using the RB 25 loom before I decide. I do not want to have trouble down the line if not using RB 25 computer.

The 20 computer is better as you can use a nistune module and basically get the functionality of a full aftermarket ecu, this is not possible with the 25 computer. The only issue is the 20 computer cannot run the VCT but an aftermarket controller like an eboost street/2 boost controller with an auxillery window can do this.

The 20 computer also wont have issues with the hicas computer not being plugged in (25 one will expect this), all your dash controls will work properly (25 can do this more more rewiring) and you will only need to change the tps and maybe the ignitor module depending on the series of 25 you get.

Also with the 20 computer it means you can buy a 25 without the sensors/loom/ecu and save cash. If you go the 25 computer route you need all of these components.

You should be able to find the wiring diagrams on this forum with some searching, I've found them in the past with about 30 minutes of searching.

The 20 computer is better as you can use a nistune module and basically get the functionality of a full aftermarket ecu, this is not possible with the 25 computer. The only issue is the 20 computer cannot run the VCT but an aftermarket controller like an eboost street/2 boost controller with an auxillery window can do this.

The 20 computer also wont have issues with the hicas computer not being plugged in (25 one will expect this), all your dash controls will work properly (25 can do this more more rewiring) and you will only need to change the tps and maybe the ignitor module depending on the series of 25 you get.

Also with the 20 computer it means you can buy a 25 without the sensors/loom/ecu and save cash. If you go the 25 computer route you need all of these components.

You should be able to find the wiring diagrams on this forum with some searching, I've found them in the past with about 30 minutes of searching.

I am living in Japan so some parts are easy to find. Not sure how much a Nistune will be.

So basically if I use everything 20 except for engine and transmission, I will only need to have the computer tuned, and make a 2nd switch for the VCT to work.

What if I want to get more power than stock. My goal is 300 rwhp. How will that affect me using aftermarket computers?

If I choose the RB25 loom, will it be easier to use a Power FC instead of the stock computer?

So you are saying if I use the 25 computer I cannot use any aftermarket computers with it?

What is a TPS?

Edited by 335
So you are saying if I use the 25 computer I cannot use any aftermarket computers with it?

What is a TPS?

No if you go the aftermarket path then you can use anything, what I was getting at is the nistune module installed in the rb20 ecu makes for a very stealthy cheap upgrade with basically the same features as a full aftermarket ecu, it is not available for the rb25 computer though.

If you are planning on going full aftermarket anyway then it is a moot point, I'll leave that question up to someone else as I don't know much about the compatibility of other aftermarket computers.

TPS is the round thing on the front of your cam cover that controls timing. . Sounds like you are going to need some help - plenty of expertise in Japan - get friendly with a workshop that will do some of the hard bits for you or try and get in contact with some of the members of this and other forums that live in Japan.

You can order a nistune chip by mail or for a quite bit more Mines and other tuning shops can chip the RB25 ecu.

As you have time read a few of the relevant threads to build up your knowledge.

TPS is the round thing on the front of your cam cover that controls timing. . Sounds like you are going to need some help - plenty of expertise in Japan - get friendly with a workshop that will do some of the hard bits for you or try and get in contact with some of the members of this and other forums that live in Japan.

You can order a nistune chip by mail or for a quite bit more Mines and other tuning shops can chip the RB25 ecu.

As you have time read a few of the relevant threads to build up your knowledge.

TPS is actually the throttle position sensor and it sits on the throttle body reading between 0-5v depending on the percentage it is open. You are thinking of the CAS (crank angle sensor), I'm fairly sure that they all emit the same signal and do not need to be changed.

TPS is actually the throttle position sensor and it sits on the throttle body reading between 0-5v depending on the percentage it is open. You are thinking of the CAS (crank angle sensor), I'm fairly sure that they all emit the same signal and do not need to be changed.

So it sounds like the rb 20 loom is the better way to go. Only the engine, and transmission will change? So Hicas wont work after the engine change?

How much does Nistune cost?

If I go the 25 computer and loom, I will need what other sensors and parts?

TPS is actually the throttle position sensor and it sits on the throttle body reading between 0-5v depending on the percentage it is open. You are thinking of the CAS (crank angle sensor), I'm fairly sure that they all emit the same signal and do not need to be changed.
Oops must get more sleep!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...