Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I played my Rogue last night for a bit, and Durotar is completely different.

Has UC or Silvermoon City changed at all like Orgrimmar has??

My warlock is 63, still 2 weeks till Cata so I have time to get to at least 75 :rofl2:

locks are awesome in pvp

the game will be a lot different at 85, stuff that is decent now might be better or worse at 85, warlocks will still be pretty good

warriors will get a huge buff because of the new skills they get, also the pace of pvp will be slower, no more killing people in 1-2 seconds

tranfered my warrior and paladin to Frostmourne, only plan on doing pvp, hope to get Gladiator again

if you want a big boost you leveling and have nothing to do now you should do 25 quests in icecrown and stormpeaks ready to hand in when cata goes live, it will get you about half way to 81 in less then 5mins if u do quests that have hand in all in the same spot

Edited by driftnick13

coming out tomory i think, the nerd que is gonna be large so i might just wait till the next day...

day or 2... there i always a few weeks of bad lag....DCing...random crap, and anoyed nerds raging all thru trade chat about issues that happen every time there is an Xpac.

so yeah i'd wait a week before trying to actually play.....lol

Farrrrk yeah, Cataclysm tomorrow! EB Games at the morley galleria isn't selling it till 4pm onwards :(

At least I can go straight after work and get it :D

its not as easy as it sounds, youll have to deal with xmas crowd and then the nerd crowd for eb

picked it up for 38 bucks at jb last night, no crowd, was really quiet actually.

i started a goblin warrior last night, the starting quests for them are awesome, and the racial abilities are pretty cool to, they come in handy

Edited by Clutch

Honestly i am not sure =[

Something about their overall appearance wasnt as... fearsome? as i had hoped.

Or at least being a hunter anyway. I think they will look amazing as melee type only. But i have every melee character already!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...