Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have an r33 non turbo and i want more performance there are so many things that have been done to it but i still find it hard to get from 0-100 in less than 9seconds i crack 8seconds wen im lucky. i shift every gear at about 6 and a half grand so i dont think its running the way it should. because it has CAI,pod,high flow exhaust 3" all the way extracter as well. so i dont understand why im not getting what i what.

this is all i want 0-100kmh in 7 seconds thats it, thats all.... What do i need to do because that one second is letting me down..... will a tune do the job? an LSD? please help... i dont want to blow the engine up or have any illegal things.. and i dont want to spend to much... unless its werth it

i have an r33 non turbo and i want more performance there are so many things that have been done to it but i still find it hard to get from 0-100 in less than 9seconds i crack 8seconds wen im lucky. i shift every gear at about 6 and a half grand so i dont think its running the way it should. because it has CAI,pod,high flow exhaust 3" all the way extracter as well. so i dont understand why im not getting what i what.

this is all i want 0-100kmh in 7 seconds thats it, thats all.... What do i need to do because that one second is letting me down..... will a tune do the job? an LSD? please help... i dont want to blow the engine up or have any illegal things.. and i dont want to spend to much... unless its werth it

Maybe your exhaust is too big - you need more backpressure. When did you change oil?

There are zillions of these threads atm...

Legal mods? There aren’t many... When my car was N/A the first thing I did to it was fit an ultra lightweight flywheel (like 4kg), if you can find one second hand its not too pricey and it made my car a lot zippier (great improvement for off the line acceleration in a low powered car). Next would be an LSD for better launches (factory turbo would be fine, just get an auto diff so you don’t lose your short gearing), then light weight rims.

Make sure your car is in good service shape, run decent low viscosity synthetic oil, fresh spark plugs and good coil packs, using copper washers to index the plugs to face the intake will give you a small gain as well. Clean the AFM, professionally clean and flow match the injectors (to factory specs, if not possible buy new ones), high flow non oiled panel filter, check your thermo fan is loose to spin, when they get old they will tighten which over spins them and saps power (and makes your car sound like a falcon). Personally I prefer electronic thermo's (I've had a bad run, lost 1 water pump and 2 radiators to these bastards) but each to their own, just make sure its in good shape - if not then replace. Turn off your A/C!!!

Run ethanol blend fuel like E10 98ron this is just my opinion, not all share it (imo N/A RB's run better on ~ E10, leans out the richer mixes and cleans all the carbon and shit out of them, plus bonus is its cheaper) replace your fuel lines if you are concerned about them (I have never had a problem but its cheap and easy to do).

Advance your ignition timing to match the fuel, 20degree's is usually recommended but I was able to go a considerable amount further without any detonation issues with performance gains.

Weight reduction never hurts, chuck out your sub or any other crap in your car, keep less fuel in your car and just top it up more often (i.e. live on 1/4 and just put $20 in it every time you pass the servo), in some states its legal to ditch the spare wheel/jack/tools and just have that tyre fix in a can.

Thats pretty much all you can get away with doing to your car, it should make it quite snappy and run smooth as well as net you excellent economy.

Edited by SKiT_R31

an aftermarket ecu will help you. but ultimately there is only so much that you can do to the car without spending big bucks, and if you are the weakest link in chain then fixing you is the easiest way to drop the times. reving out to 7000rpm or 7500rpm will drop the times a bit as even though power is dropping off you will still accelerate faster in 1st gear than in second. also not sure on the gear ratios of the natros, but the turbos will do over 100kmh in 2nd, as will the natro sr20's (the missus pulsar will do about 110kmh in second).

tyres can make a difference. grippier tyres will allow you to get a better launch. also make sure you have the correct pressure in them. lower in the rear will give you better grip off the line, but after that it slows you down. too low in the front will slow you down from the moment you start moving.

if you have stiff suspension, such as coil overs, then that will be slowing you down as well because you can't get off the line as quick with stiff suspension. you will get more wheel spin.

an aftermarket ecu will help you. but ultimately there is only so much that you can do to the car without spending big bucks, and if you are the weakest link in chain then fixing you is the easiest way to drop the times. reving out to 7000rpm or 7500rpm will drop the times a bit as even though power is dropping off you will still accelerate faster in 1st gear than in second. also not sure on the gear ratios of the natros, but the turbos will do over 100kmh in 2nd, as will the natro sr20's (the missus pulsar will do about 110kmh in second).

To determine shift points, you actually need to put them on a dyno, and perform a torque run in each gear.

It has often been found while it "feels" faster revvin it's nuts off, because the motor produces peak torque a 4000RMPf or example shifting early to drop back into this peak torque is often beneficial.

bikerboy14 heres how to get more performance, but first these questions:

1. Are you under 21?

2. Do you live in a state where there is P plate restrictions for power/turbos?

3. Do you only have a small amount of money to spend car?

If you answered Yes to either 1 & 2 or 1/2 & 3 then unfortunately the simple answer is you can't get much more out of it until you answer no to them.

If you answered No to the questions then its pretty simple:

save up $2,000. Either get a rb25det and put it into the car or +t your current rb25de. U'll get alot more out of it then spending little bits here and there and you will be really happy with the results.

Unfortunately this is the blunt truth when modifying for decent power.

gl.

To determine shift points, you actually need to put them on a dyno, and perform a torque run in each gear.

It has often been found while it "feels" faster revvin it's nuts off, because the motor produces peak torque a 4000RMPf or example shifting early to drop back into this peak torque is often beneficial.

depends on the gearing though. while you can get back into better torque values, the speed that the car accelerates in the lower gear can cancel this out. in higher gears where you are spending time at the high rpm for a longer period of time this is more where you may want to shift earlier. in the case of first gear though (and second to a lesser extent), it revs up so quickly that the time it is spent past peak power outweighs being at a slightly thicker part of the torque curve. and since the OP is only talking about 0-100kmh then we don't need to bother much about the higher gears, which is why i also made the comment about whether or not it will do 100kmh in 2nd or not, because changing out of 2nd at 6500rpm will produce a slower time than reving out that last 1000rpm to get over 100kmh. this is actually the reason why in the early 90's the manual falcons were slower in 0-100kmh than the manual commodores, but were faster over the 1/4 mile. second gear in the falcon maxed out at just under 100kmh and the commodore was just over 100kmh.

then it comes down to how the car revs out as well. if the car had stock exhaust then it would start to choke at well below redline so even reving out first would be a waste of time. but the car in question is stated as having extractors and a 3" system, so it should rev out to redline reasonably well.

The dyno will give the torque reading at the wheels, so if you did it in each gear you could find the ideal shift point which includes both engine output and gearing.

My factory N/A does ~ 53kmph in first and ~88kmph in second, 140kmph in 3rd and 180kmph in fourth, 4.36:1 Final Drive Ratio with R32 GTR gearbox (a couple kph taller than the stock N/A box) RB25DE's run similar gbox ratio's to RB20DET gearboxes, so longer first, not sure about second.

Edited by SKiT_R31
There are zillions of these threads atm...

Legal mods? There aren’t many... When my car was N/A the first thing I did to it was fit an ultra lightweight flywheel (like 4kg), if you can find one second hand its not too pricey and it made my car a lot zippier (great improvement for off the line acceleration in a low powered car). Next would be an LSD for better launches (factory turbo would be fine, just get an auto diff so you don’t lose your short gearing), then light weight rims.

Make sure your car is in good service shape, run decent low viscosity synthetic oil, fresh spark plugs and good coil packs, using copper washers to index the plugs to face the intake will give you a small gain as well. Clean the AFM, professionally clean and flow match the injectors (to factory specs, if not possible buy new ones), high flow non oiled panel filter, check your thermo fan is loose to spin, when they get old they will tighten which over spins them and saps power (and makes your car sound like a falcon). Personally I prefer electronic thermo's (I've had a bad run, lost 1 water pump and 2 radiators to these bastards) but each to their own, just make sure its in good shape - if not then replace. Turn off your A/C!!!

Run ethanol blend fuel like E10 98ron this is just my opinion, not all share it (imo N/A RB's run better on ~ E10, leans out the richer mixes and cleans all the carbon and shit out of them, plus bonus is its cheaper) replace your fuel lines if you are concerned about them (I have never had a problem but its cheap and easy to do).

Advance your ignition timing to match the fuel, 20degree's is usually recommended but I was able to go a considerable amount further without any detonation issues with performance gains.

Weight reduction never hurts, chuck out your sub or any other crap in your car, keep less fuel in your car and just top it up more often (i.e. live on 1/4 and just put $20 in it every time you pass the servo), in some states its legal to ditch the spare wheel/jack/tools and just have that tyre fix in a can.

Thats pretty much all you can get away with doing to your car, it should make it quite snappy and run smooth as well as net you excellent economy.

What the hell, that's a new one :P

yeah it's supposed to put the open side of the spark closer to incoming air/fuel mix. there is 1 major flaw in this idea and that is that by the time the air has come into the cylinder, the valve has closed and the piston has then travelled all the way back up the bore and compressed the mix, the air is going to be all over the place so it's not going to do much at all. i reakon that you'd struggle to notice the difference even on a dyno. the reason being that by using washers (even small ones) to get the plugs pointing in the direction you want, you are removing the spark plug from the chamber a bit, so you may be slowing down the amount of time it takes for all the fuel to burn, and you want it to burn as fast as possible so it is expanding while the pressure is at its peak.

its an interesting theory, but yeh I would think spacing it out a little to make them face a certain direction would be more hindering. Personally I dont like the idea of fiddling around that area with small spacers and stuff because if anything dropped into the block ( fillings or other small bits ) ... what a pain in the ass/ motor could crap itself.

It’s obviously not going to gain big numbers but there is a gain, some engines benefit more than others - some like the plug facing other directions as well. The idea is also that you start the burn on the intake for it to burn across in the direction of the exhaust, intake side is also generally the most fuel saturated and colder side so any help to even the burn is good.

As long as you have the right sized copper washer it can’t go down the hole (as it has to fit around the plug thread) and once squished is going to take sfa of the plug out of the cyl, you are not going to lose power from any change in compression, that’s like saying multi-ground electrodes make more power because they take up more space (but they lose power as they cover the spark).

I'm also a big fan of having all cylinders symmetrical, if all your plugs are matched, your cyl's have equal compression and your injecting the same amount of air (and most ideal if your intake runners and exhaust primary's flow equally) you can usually get that extra couple degree's timing or slightly leaner mixtures to produce more power before you start to get detonation (whereas normally the lean hot cyl will ping earlier than the rest making you lax the tune early).

But yeah, it’s just one of those basic efficiency's, it doesn’t hurt you to do it and nets a kw or 2, if your chasing power that’s hard to get (like in an N/A) every kW counts.

i wasn't saying that it will alter compression, i was saying that it removes the spark plug from the chamber a little bit. yes it's SFA, but the more central to the chamber the spark plug is the better the burn will be.

if you light a fire from the centre it will burn outwards and burn faster than if you start it at 1 side

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...