Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There seem to be quite a few good ol' v8's out there that can pull fast quarters, in the 9-11 sec bracket and doing it seemingly effortlessly when I have seen it at Willowbank.

It has just caught my attention and it seems there is a fair amount of drama involved with doing it in a 4/6. Lotsa noise and no guarantees kinda atmosphere.

These old fords I was getting to look at where nothing special. I was with mates of the owners and they were all a pretty standard setup with 2 speed boxes, good low grunt and juuuuuust the right suspension setup and tyre pressure (soft rears, really soft). Hell even a panel van did a 9!

'Lines tend more toward circuit setup in my limited perspective and obviously the 60 time is critical so if you were to trick the box, raise the stall and work the suspension it would be interesting to see how the stock power output would do over the early part of the course. Just seems too many import owners get the suspension and 'box setup wrong, more a street tuff setup.

  • 1 month later...

Once you get into the 12's (high/low) with mph over 120, tyres are the clincher...

On street tyres (ie. falken azenis st115 - which are sm_limpy.gif), the best I've run is 12.3 @ 124mph - with a 2.35 60ft...

Going by the fact that for each 0.1 sec at the 60ft line you should be able to make up 0.2 sec at the other end, a 1.85 sec 60ft time (in theory) should be worth a full second at the other end of the track.

The thing you've got to remember, is think about how quick 0.1 of a second is. It's about the same amount of time as it takes to blink!

The cheapest way to get an 11 sec 1/4 with the smallest amount of power, is a set of 90/10's in the front, 70/30's in the back, a 4000rpm high-stall, slicks and a set of front-runners!

Cheers,

matt

What gearbox would you put behind a rb30det? Im in the process of starting a new project and ive decided its got to be drag foremost (over daily driving) it will still be a 'street car'. With this in mind ive decided on auto, can they do a jatco 4 speed which retains 4 speeds and can hold 500 rwhp. Or should i be looking at a turbo 350 with adapter plate?

What gearbox would you put behind a rb30det? Im in the process of starting a new project and ive decided its got to be drag foremost (over daily driving) it will still be a 'street car'. With this in mind ive decided on auto, can they do a jatco 4 speed which retains 4 speeds and can hold 500 rwhp. Or should i be looking at a turbo 350 with adapter plate?

first of all, if you're looking to build a car for drag racing, why are looking at retaining the crappy 4 spd Jatco?

depending on what times you're after, you'd ideally be better off going for a Trimatic or even a 2spd Powerglide :kick:

secondly,

if you're really dead set on the idea of the Jatco, i believe Yarrey Valley Autos are the guys to talk to.

Ummm sorry rev210 but how is it possible for them to be achieving these times on street tyres. As far as I know only two GTR's in the country have even acheived mid/low 9's using nittos and they are Keir Wilson and Munro. They get traction problems in their 4wd equipped cars so how is it possible for the v8's not only to grab traction but finish the quarter with such low times on radial tyres. (I am trying to say they must be using slicks)

I was at a drag event at Willowbank 2 years ago and one of the guys I was with had a panelvan...V8 obviously and rear tyres with tread. Didn't take much notice other than that but they were running pretty low pressure. Ran a 9.? second pass as easy as. I was rocked, but this thing didn't like corners.

The V8 brigade have the drags sorted so there are a few things to learn off them.

What gearbox would you put behind a rb30det? Im in the process of starting a new project and ive decided its got to be drag foremost (over daily driving) it will still be a 'street car'. With this in mind ive decided on auto, can they do a jatco 4 speed which retains 4 speeds and can hold 500 rwhp. Or should i be looking at a turbo 350 with adapter plate?

I had a vl calais turbo with a 5 speed RB30DET box in it and it handled 220rwkw easily. But i went through clutches and diffs a fair bit. U put a good driveline on it, over 200 kw and ull be scaring alot of the nice cars on the road. ( i miss mine :) )

Ummm sorry rev210 but how is it possible for them to be achieving these times on street tyres. As far as I know only two GTR's in the country have even acheived mid/low 9's using nittos and they are Keir Wilson and Munro. They get traction problems in their 4wd equipped cars so how is it possible for the v8's not only to grab traction but finish the quarter with such low times on radial tyres. (I am trying to say they must be using slicks)

go to your local drag strip, then we will have this discussion again if you think there is a point to it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...