Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I jus got a Alpine v12 amp and 12 inch sub. Now i have a dilema. What do you guys would be the best set up for a R33. Like i want to know what would give out punchy bass; a fully sealed and boxed sub box or the standard type sub box (where you can see the sub). Space is not a issue for me cos there is nothing ever in my boot anyways. I am hearing conflicting views on what is the better type sub enclosure. I know with home theathre systems almost all are fully enclosed now days. Anyways i thought id put this question forward b4 i chose one next week. Your opinions will be much appreciated. Thanks guys.

The best type of enclosure is the one that suits the type of sub you bought. If it's an alpine 12"? they come with an installation sheet that recommends what type of enclosure suits it.

Post the exact model and someone should be able to advise you what will work best.

Hey guys, thanks for your replies so far. Well the sub is a Alpine type S sub (12 inch and the amp is a Alpine V power amp and has a RMS of 350 Watts. So its not 2 bad. I like punchy bass and i usually listen to R&b and Hip hop and a bit of house music. So what you guys reckon?

When mentioned "fully enclosed" and "semi enclosed" be was reffering to:

Fully enclosed: Front and rear chambers (unable to see sub at all, just looks like one massive box with holes, useally twice the volume of a standard sealed unit)

Semi enclosed: Only has one sealed chamber, able to see either the front of the sub (most common), or the rear (sub fires into the sealed box)

If you have a great designer, and someone that is capable of building a strong box to exact specification, i would choose the band-pass design (fully enclosed). When designed and built properly, these enclosures produce the deepest, loudest and cleanest bass.

Design and build quality is vital.

hey guys,

Thanks for all ya replies so far. I think im leaning towards a fully enclosed sub box. My mate did his one and it sounds pretty good so i will get him to make me a box. he has some kinda fibre fill to insulate it as well. I love my clean bass rather than the "oomf oomf look at me" kinda bullshit. Anyways i also checked out the Alpine website and they got some info on it:

ALPINE Type-S SWS-1241/D 12" Rec Volume for sealed box 35 litres @ 49Hz

also adds:

Sealed enclosure volume includes heavy layers of dacron or similar fibre 'fill' and allows for displcement of the woofer. This is internal volume of box to build for effective in-car performance (Qtc 0.58 - 0.82). Sealed box volumes can also be varied.

You'll definately need an enclosure for that sub. The big question is sealed or ported? I am leaning towards a 'low frequency tuned' ported enclosure due to your power levels and music types. How much boot space can you spare champ?

I would probably tune the enclosure to 32hz but the enlcosure will be a little large (like around 1.5cf).

Hey FHrx. thats the question i wanna know as well hehe sealed or ported. I was thinking of going sealed but u may have made me change my mind. i can spare the whole boot since i never put anything in there anyway hehe.

Hey guys, Finally got my sub and amp put it. It sounds exaclty how i wanted it to. went with the fully enclosed box in the end. thanks for all your comments and advice. If you wanna see pics, they are in the post below.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=34157

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...