Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I jus got a Alpine v12 amp and 12 inch sub. Now i have a dilema. What do you guys would be the best set up for a R33. Like i want to know what would give out punchy bass; a fully sealed and boxed sub box or the standard type sub box (where you can see the sub). Space is not a issue for me cos there is nothing ever in my boot anyways. I am hearing conflicting views on what is the better type sub enclosure. I know with home theathre systems almost all are fully enclosed now days. Anyways i thought id put this question forward b4 i chose one next week. Your opinions will be much appreciated. Thanks guys.

The best type of enclosure is the one that suits the type of sub you bought. If it's an alpine 12"? they come with an installation sheet that recommends what type of enclosure suits it.

Post the exact model and someone should be able to advise you what will work best.

Hey guys, thanks for your replies so far. Well the sub is a Alpine type S sub (12 inch and the amp is a Alpine V power amp and has a RMS of 350 Watts. So its not 2 bad. I like punchy bass and i usually listen to R&b and Hip hop and a bit of house music. So what you guys reckon?

When mentioned "fully enclosed" and "semi enclosed" be was reffering to:

Fully enclosed: Front and rear chambers (unable to see sub at all, just looks like one massive box with holes, useally twice the volume of a standard sealed unit)

Semi enclosed: Only has one sealed chamber, able to see either the front of the sub (most common), or the rear (sub fires into the sealed box)

If you have a great designer, and someone that is capable of building a strong box to exact specification, i would choose the band-pass design (fully enclosed). When designed and built properly, these enclosures produce the deepest, loudest and cleanest bass.

Design and build quality is vital.

hey guys,

Thanks for all ya replies so far. I think im leaning towards a fully enclosed sub box. My mate did his one and it sounds pretty good so i will get him to make me a box. he has some kinda fibre fill to insulate it as well. I love my clean bass rather than the "oomf oomf look at me" kinda bullshit. Anyways i also checked out the Alpine website and they got some info on it:

ALPINE Type-S SWS-1241/D 12" Rec Volume for sealed box 35 litres @ 49Hz

also adds:

Sealed enclosure volume includes heavy layers of dacron or similar fibre 'fill' and allows for displcement of the woofer. This is internal volume of box to build for effective in-car performance (Qtc 0.58 - 0.82). Sealed box volumes can also be varied.

You'll definately need an enclosure for that sub. The big question is sealed or ported? I am leaning towards a 'low frequency tuned' ported enclosure due to your power levels and music types. How much boot space can you spare champ?

I would probably tune the enclosure to 32hz but the enlcosure will be a little large (like around 1.5cf).

Hey FHrx. thats the question i wanna know as well hehe sealed or ported. I was thinking of going sealed but u may have made me change my mind. i can spare the whole boot since i never put anything in there anyway hehe.

Hey guys, Finally got my sub and amp put it. It sounds exaclty how i wanted it to. went with the fully enclosed box in the end. thanks for all your comments and advice. If you wanna see pics, they are in the post below.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=34157

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...