Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey iguys i have a hks twin plate solid centre racing clutch i have to sell to suit a RB series motor, It is designed for a GTR but i was told when i bought it that it will suit and RB series engine, comes with chromeoly flywheel and has been hardly used, in new condition. I have decided not to put it on my gf's gts-t as it is going to be too hard for her to drive. These clutches retail for over 3k.

Im asking 2200 ono.

Im located in newcastle so you can either come here and pick it up if you want it or i can frieght it to you.

Will get hold of some pix of it in the next few days so leave ur email address and i can post em out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33897-fs-hks-twin-plate-racing-clutch/
Share on other sites

just to let you guys have a brief idea of how it feels:

a mate of mine had it in his R33 GTR and bloody hard to drive, esp when moving off... but they bite real great and absolutely no slippage at all. Jap-Jet was right not to fit it for his gf becos it would have been a killer to drive esp at heavy traffic.

btw, my mate did a 7000rpm launch with the same clutch before and it rocks!!

Genesis, let me clear up this confusion.

I have the same HKS GD Pro push type clutch in my ECR33 that J-J is selling.

Your mate's clutch is a pull type & is nasty...few will argue.

I drive daily with this clutch & it's very user friendly given its nature & rating.

Good luck with the sale J-J.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...