Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day

Just wondering if many people have had issues with frying igniters when using Vipec? Might not be a related problem but there's two I know of now and I'm trying to get a feel for whether this is common.

Not trying to criticise the Vipec, I'm very happy with mine.

I know igniters die from heat and age but I'm interested to see if there's a few dying when a Vipec is involved.

Related thread here

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...rs-t340484.html

Thanks

Edited by Scooby
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/340779-vipec-and-frying-igniters/
Share on other sites

my old tuner killed my ignitor when we put a vi-pec v44, ran for a little bit then died, this was on my old s13 sr20det.

put in a microtech x4 ignitor and not sure if he changed any settings but it has run ever since, he tried to blame the heat and its age etc but i really dont believe it, was too coincidental.

I'm running a v44, haven't driven the car much since installation though due to boost issues. I've resolved those as of yesterday (touches wood) so I'll be driving it a lot more soon, will find out if I join the fried igniter club.

Dave do you think dwell would specifically kill the earth circuit in the igniter? BoostdBarge pulled his apart and in each case the earth circuit had gone. Soldered it up and all's been good for a long while.

I guess the earth circuit works harder than the rest as it's loaded 6:1 every time a cylinder fires and with wasted spark it's even worse. So with excessive dwell it'd be under signficant load.

DVS32R what circumstances did yours die under ie cruise, idle, boost etc?

I don't expect there's going to be a mass of people with this issue, but a few is enough to suggest more than a coincidence.

Edited by Scooby

Ditch your coils and ignitors and run LS1 coils.

This issue has been found on other skyline forums as well, the stock ignitor will need to tuned wit dewell time before you can get more use out of them but they apparently still die even when you get the settings right.

also remember this is a wasted spark system. the coils / ignitor is running harder then it would in a common standard ECU situation that has direct fire for all coils at once.

Extra fire from wasted spark = extra heat = extra problems with weak earthsinside the ignitor, im sure nissan did not design everything to run a 200% speed so old age and turning up the ante with wasted spark explains why.

LS1 or LS2 coils are the go.

I seen standard coils run fine up to 400hp at wheels, i upgraded to the vipec and found lots of problems with spark blowing out no matter what i did.

Replaced coils with LS1's and problem was solved.

if you wired in a v88 im sure this problem will be seen rarely.

As mentioned, I have fried a few of these. Even a brand new one from Nissan ($750 worth!)... I've reduced the dwell, put in Splitfire coil packs and soldered the burnt out ground and haven't had a problem for a year now. Anyone know of any other wasted-spark setups that are burning out ignitors?

Pics of the inners of the ignitor and the fix here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ca...67#entry4875367

Ok spoke to Ray Hall, extremely helpful as usual. Emailed him the map and he was on the phone 10 mins later, confirmed the dwell is fine, if anything a touch on the conservative side.

Asked about the V88 and he said it would allow more dwell but he doesn't believe the V44 is the cause in any case so nothing to be gained by switching to V88 his view.

He suggested it's most likely either a voltage spike, in which case the ecu would probably have been fried, or a poor earth, and to call Mark at Godzilla motorsport. Again, Mark was really helpful. He also suggested a poor earth.

there is nothing wrong with the vipec, its just my guess that the default dwell setting is to long, more dwell = more spark but hotter running. less dwell gives a weaker spark but nicer on the drivers.

i burnt out 2x bosch 008 igniters with my old autronic before i worked it out..

im fairly sure stock dwell time is around 2ms most people run up to 3.5ms without dramas.

Mine was a bit over 2ms. We reduced it to around 1.7 I think. It still fried after that, so it doesn't seem to be dwell that's the problem. Good idea to check your ground. I measured mine and also pulled the coil pack loom apart and re-taped it. Couldn't find any issues. Very strange...

Scooby, so you're in Brissy? Me too. I could probably fix the coilpack for you if you want. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...