Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep, that's pretty much the guts of it. But (at least from my point of view, and not just trying to defend the A1RM here) the A1RM is cheap enough, that even if you went through rotors twice as quick, you're pretty much at the same level as having to buy a $300 race pad from one brand, and a $100 street pad from another, and you haven't had to worry about changing pads between street/track, or their compatibility between compounds...

From peoples comments it seems that the A1RM wears rotors nearly as bad as a dedicated track pad but with lower performance.

I have not personally tried to A1RM but it seems everyone agrees those pads are aggressive on rotors for daily driving. You often compare them to DS2500s which are more expensive. When comparing the two we should note that the DS2500s are very friendly on rotors, by this I mean there is no way you would wear out a set of rotors in 20,000kms from daily driving with a bit of track work.

So fair enough the A1RM is cheaper but if used as a crossover pad as you suggest but will probably end up costing you the same or more as using DS2500s due to rotor replacement costs. On the other hand they sound like a reasonable track only pad for their low price.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shouldn't need a "base map" for anything other than guidance to ignition tuning. You just need the engine capacity right, the injector size right, and something, almost anything, for a VE map. On an NA engine, fuelling is almost completely a function of load signal & rpm. It should run and drive with a completely flat fuel map. It will be too lean under load, but that's easily fixed. We used to tune all ECUs without any base map. There were no such things (until someone had tuned a near stock engine on one, and then they had a "base map".
    • What did you actually buy/how much did it cost? When I got mine in like.. 2017...? 2019? the aim was to run Torque for gauges via ODB2 and things like Track Addict/Laptimers/Dashcam/Reversecam/Spotify etc. Mine never broke, but I wonder if you've got the same needs (it sounds like it). Cause I liked the idea of being able to do anything with it. That said, yours also cost 3x the cost of what I spent so... food for thought.  
    • For me there is a massive difference in manufacturer or big brand crippled android (Sony, Kenwood etc) vs the sort of thing I've installed here, which is basically just a tablet in DIN form factor with open Android, and the other model of course is mirroring - Android Auto/Carplay. I hate the locked down manufacturer and AA options where they decide what apps I'm allowed to install, including the Launcher but also importantly things like Ecutek (for this car) or Real Dash (Stagea) are not supported. Plus those crippled versions tend to be slower due to both overheads and lower spec hardware. On the other hand, when this breaks I'll likely be in trouble for support....but how is that different to owning an Infiniti anyway
    • Yeah, Duncan is helping sell me back to Android devices. I've hated the whole Android head units due to their speed issues. Even in my old Hyundai Kona (2022 model), it behind the scenes was Android, and slow and shitty to start up. Once running wasn't bad, but still a good 15 to 30 seconds.
    • My roof rails are off atm on the E39 until the rust is fixed. I did find another little bit of surface rust under the rails when I took them off. As @soviet_merlin said I'd just leave them alone unless you're planning on ensuring they're properly sealed. I was on the fence about leaving them off as the delete is still a thing in BMW E39's but I feel like the car is missing something (er, it is, der) with them off and I'm looking forward to putting them back on.
×
×
  • Create New...