Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just an update on the GCG hiflow with OP6 rear housing

I had to get a boost leak sorted (repositioned cooler piping and tightened a hose clamp), base timing reset to 15 (mechanic didn't do this properly when i got a major service) and ECU tuned by Toshi, who did a great job!

OP6 GCG hiflow wasn't as laggy as I thought it was, it was surprisingly linear, less lag than GT2540, you can see positive pressure from just over 2000rpm and full 17psi from 4000rpm

it doesn't have the midrange rush like the R33 GCG high flow, but provided a very linear delivery with strong top end, which i think is great for track, whereas the r33 GCG hiflow will be good for street.

don't know what the max power figure is though, as the tune is done on the road, one thing Toshi did mention is that he thinks it drives simillar to hypergear OP6 highflow

for the price of $2000 new, complete bolt on ball bearing unit, i think it is good value for money

Edited by chiksluvit
  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Question , is a 96 build GTS25T with a genuine 91K a rare beast nowdays ?

I have a 96 GTS25T with 95k :)

I also have a GTRS turbo. I make 252rwkw @ 15psi. There's probably more in it, but as my tuner said, the power was 'there' without leaning on the motor too hard so why push my luck!

As for how it drives on the street, its kind of deceptive.. sometimes it doesn't 'feel' like you are going fast, but looking at the speedo its obvious that it isnt true. Also, I can't speak for anyone else's car, but I have pretty good tyres and unless its provoked my car just digs in, grips and rips through 1st and 2nd.

EDIT: Forgot to add, that my car passed over the pits with a GT-RS 8)

Edited by SoFreshSoClean
  • 2 weeks later...

went for a drive with andymoocow today, and i must say that the GTRS' response is noticeably better than the OP6 hiflow

both turbos are quite linear, yet GTRS feels like it has a fatter torque curve throughout the rev range

the OP6 GCG has that second of lag on downshift acceleration, with GTRS, this is almost unnoticeable.

my boost is limited to 16psi with AVCR and still standard actuator, whereas andymoocow's GTRS is running 18 psi, this may affect the overall performance. But overall you get what you pay for.

was good fun going for a spin in your car too mate, good to feel the old GCG again, ahhh good memories :D

I do love the GT-RS turbo still, and will most likely bolt another one on when this one comes to the end of its life. Sure there are PLENTY of other turbos out there with more power, but response is what i love when driving sydney roads, which are almost all 50km/hr near me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...