Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

does anybody know what intake i can put on my rb25 neo so that it sits on the left of the engine and not crossing over the top.

like a rb26 or sr20 style.

some thing that will bolt straight on and not involve to much fiddling around, (obviously have to modify intercooler piping and throttle body/cable etc)

cheers for any help

Edited by Skavenski
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343484-rb25-neo-intake/
Share on other sites

not 100% on if a plazzy will fit a neo. But if they do make them for the neo, a plazzy would be my choice.

All you have to do is take off the top half of your stock intake manifold, and bolt up the plazzy. Alot easier than a GReddy style plenum.

Plazmaman start at around $800-900 i think for the raw version.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343484-rb25-neo-intake/#findComment-5538499
Share on other sites

depends on the one chosen.

you'd pretty much need to budget 1-1.2k if DIY or 1.5-1.7k if you are paying someone for gasket and replacing a few hoses too (might as well while you are there).

Not the cheapest exercise!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343484-rb25-neo-intake/#findComment-5538623
Share on other sites

is it hard to move the throttle body, will i need a new cable or is the stock one long enough,

If you go the plazzy, no. Stock is fine, they send you out a bracket for it.

If you get one, specify that your using the stock t/v so you dont need to get an adapter or a larget t/b

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343484-rb25-neo-intake/#findComment-5538883
Share on other sites

I've got a Plazmaman in my 34 and it's great. But make no mistake it is a bitch to fit up, the bolts are just really hard to get to as it doesn't end up leaving you a great deal of room to work around.

Oh and you will also have to move your fuse box out of the way as it will foul the Throttle Body.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343484-rb25-neo-intake/#findComment-5550605
Share on other sites

All the piping work for mine was completed by Pro Race and they changed the BOV position so I'm not too sure how much work will have to be done to plumb it back in. Some other little things include extending the wiring for the TPS because obviously the TB is in a completely different position and also fitting up the Idle Control piping.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/343484-rb25-neo-intake/#findComment-5550758
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...