Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I duno about other r34's but mine is very smooth to drive around town, and if you want to hoon around like every other retard it does 0-40 in 1st gear pretty fast with great response.

Custom stainless steel intake with pod and 2 1/4 inch exhaust with wide rear tires = pretty good power in low - mid range

Edited by R34 -_-
  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pick the cr you like the best...not like you drive it everywhere at WOT and 7k rpm.....for street duties the Supra gets my vote simple because of the bigger motor, same brakes as the turbo model etc...so later, just throw a GT42 at it and run 9's

Only the SZ-R (which is substantially more expensive) and some SZs with the big brake option have the same brakes as the turbo models. Mine are piddly little 2/1 pot. Word of warning, IF you do decide to go the Supra route with the intention of turbo charging it later, buy the SZ-R, not just because of the improved brakes, diff, etc, but most importantly because it has the Getrag 6spd. The 5spd will bust at around 250rwkw which isn't much in the 2J world.

You would be better off looking at the overalls of a car...SSS pulsars are by far the fastest affordable P plater car going around because we know a lotus or somehing is just a joke :)

With my GTS-4 its was pretty slow so i rebored and honed it out too a 2.7L ( + compleate engine rebuild) and a exedy heavy duty clutch (thats all it needed) and it was already faster than a NA supra by far and lots of other cars but thats only speed. The supra's brakes out do NA skyline brakes two times over so if you come through corners the supra was always entering faster. But then again once im off my P's a rb26 just drops right into the car with the added adition of wiring looms and a ecu so its just what suits me not whats best on papper.

Just giving examples, you should buy what best suits you, not what is the best on papper.

You would be better off looking at the overalls of a car...SSS pulsars are by far the fastest affordable P plater car going around because we know a lotus or somehing is just a joke :)

With my GTS-4 its was pretty slow so i rebored and honed it out too a 2.7L ( + compleate engine rebuild) and a exedy heavy duty clutch (thats all it needed) and it was already faster than a NA supra by far and lots of other cars but thats only speed. The supra's brakes out do NA skyline brakes two times over so if you come through corners the supra was always entering faster. But then again once im off my P's a rb26 just drops right into the car with the added adition of wiring looms and a ecu so its just what suits me not whats best on papper.

Just giving examples, you should buy what best suits you, not what is the best on papper.

How much power did you get from the rebore + hone??

80thou over will put you in the water jacket...would redefine "floating" wrist pins lol.

A simple overbore wont net you anymore than a couple of horsepower, so unless you did a heap of headwork/cams/ecu/compression etc.

So my guess is the motor was Fubar so it felt quicker when it was running properly.

As for the supra brakes, only the 1996-> got the big 4 pots, the early ones has the same brakes as my soarer/non-turbo supras.

80thou over will put you in the water jacket...would redefine "floating" wrist pins lol.

A simple overbore wont net you anymore than a couple of horsepower, so unless you did a heap of headwork/cams/ecu/compression etc.

So my guess is the motor was Fubar so it felt quicker when it was running properly.

As for the supra brakes, only the 1996-> got the big 4 pots, the early ones has the same brakes as my soarer/non-turbo supras.

Well 40thou is the norm, I personally know people who have gone custom 60thou, and I have seen 80thou RB26 pistons for sale before (which you would need for RB26 crank) but have no experience with them of course.

link; http://www.trust-power.com/06new/e2004_09/041101_greddy.html

Thin cyl walls are never a good idea for high power FI, but I doubt it would be an issue for a well made N/A. Problem with this is you would need custom pistons (probably RB25DE dome with RB26 pin height) or you would lose any capacity benefit due to compression loss.

Anyway, off topic.

Edited by SKiT_R31

The problem going with 88mm slugs is the bore degradation after nearly 20 years of use, if you pop the welch plugs out you will see how badly the outside of he bores are rusted.

So If I were to go 80thou over (88mm) I would x-ray the shit outta the block so see how much meat there is, some blocks wont even take 60thou due to core shift when being cast, Or I would sleeve the block.

E.g 10-15 years ago you could take a small block ford (windsor or cleveland) out 60thou, these days no-one goes past 40 because a fair bit of the bores have rusted away and you will more than likely hole the bores, generally towards the bottom of the liner as they are thinner than up the top.

Yeah I know what you mean, I replaced the head on a mates RB25DET because it blew the gasket (well so I thought), but in actual fact the coolant channel had corroded into the combustion chamber couple cylinders (just on the edge of the gasket)...

The older crowd that push the old 8's to the limits are the most known with these issues, just keep going through blocks until one sticks.

But yeah, as long as you have a good block to start with it wont be an issue - while x raying is the safest option, you should be able to tell the condition of the block just by looking at the visible parts, if there is obvious signs or corrosion, then give that extra 60cc a miss...

Edited by SKiT_R31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...