Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.nitto.com.au/products/strokerkit-RB30.html?category=strokerkits

anyone know much about these if they know someone using them etc?

thinking about one of these kits when i get me motor rebuilt

Pretty sure the kit is $5500

Have a search for 3.4 stroker and there is a dyno sheet showing difference between 25/30 and same 25 head on 3.4lt

I will be looking into one of these when I upgrade to a GTR

The 3.4 kit is done by Spool import's in QLD

http://www.spoolimports.com/content/RB34DETResults.asp

look's to be a hell of a thing, i've spoken to them and the best bet seem's to be to send them a block and have them do all the work

around 15k for a bullet proof 1600hp, 12000rpm nitto 3.2 bottom end ready for a head to be put on,

id be allowing another 7-10k for a head to be built up to allow flow to get the most out of it.

nearly got a 3.2 myself but something else came up.

the main advantage of the 3.2 nitto to the 3.4 spool is the full counter crank. beter harmonics,

but if youre just building one to rev to stock ~7500rpm, shouldnt have a problem

by parts they listed do you mean the turbo and headwork etc.?

Edited by jangles

by the parts listed it would be about a 15grand bottom end?

then easily about another 10 for the head, turbo and manifolds?

just exploring all options cause i want to do it right the

first time knowing it will handle whatever is chucked at it

if i want more out of it in the future

by the parts listed it would be about a 15grand bottom end?

then easily about another 10 for the head, turbo and manifolds?

just exploring all options cause i want to do it right the

first time knowing it will handle whatever is chucked at it

if i want more out of it in the future

i know for a fact, from sump to head studs, including head gasket, oil pump, all machining,balancer, everything just needs a head bolted on. assembled its around 15k for the nitto

a decent head is 5-10k, you would need a heavy breathing head to make any decent power,

a turbo for response and power on a 3.2 would probably be a GTX42?

so theres 3500

1300 for manifold

800 for gate

its a 30k affair for it to be done properly

around 15k for a bullet proof 1600hp, 12000rpm nitto 3.2 bottom end ready for a head to be put on,

id be allowing another 7-10k for a head to be built up to allow flow to get the most out of it.

nearly got a 3.2 myself but something else came up.

the main advantage of the 3.2 nitto to the 3.4 spool is the full counter crank. beter harmonics,

but if youre just building one to rev to stock ~7500rpm, shouldnt have a problem

Theres more to it than the counterweights that will make the Nitto better harmonic wise compared to the Spool 3.4 crank. The smaller the throw of the Nitto crank allows for more material overlap between the mains and big ends, which makes the crank stronger when it comes to twisting and also with resisting the effects of harmonic vibrations. See the attached PDF file. Then there is also the material quality used, heat treating and stress relieving processes undertaken during the machining processes. It all contributes to maintaining the strength of the material.

its a 30k affair for it to be done properly

And the rest. There is always the little bits to add on that arent remembered until the engine is in the car. Generally you can add another $5-7K in incidentals alone. Then there is tuning, and the inevitable issues that develop and kinks that need to be worked out that eat away at your savings.

Crank Overlap.pdf

Theres more to it than the counterweights that will make the Nitto better harmonic wise compared to the Spool 3.4 crank. The smaller the throw of the Nitto crank allows for more material overlap between the mains and big ends, which makes the crank stronger when it comes to twisting and also with resisting the effects of harmonic vibrations. See the attached PDF file. Then there is also the material quality used, heat treating and stress relieving processes undertaken during the machining processes. It all contributes to maintaining the strength of the material.

And the rest. There is always the little bits to add on that arent remembered until the engine is in the car. Generally you can add another $5-7K in incidentals alone. Then there is tuning, and the inevitable issues that develop and kinks that need to be worked out that eat away at your savings.

oh shit yeah, i was just giving a minimum.

if you had a 3.2 the torque would break most gearboxes, so a OS gearset would be a requirement at least... probably straight to a PPG or something though.

fuel system, etc etc etc....any engine like that amounts to thousands of unseen dollars

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have no hard data to report, but I have to say, having driven it to work and back all week, mostly on wet roads (and therefore mostly not able to contemplate anything too outrageous anywhere)..... it is real good. I turned the boost controller on, with duty cycle set to 10% (which may not be enough to actually increase the boost), and the start boost set to 15 psi. That should keep the gate unpressurised until at least 15 psi. And rolling at 80 in 5th, which is <2k rpm, going to WOT sees the MAP go +ve even before it crosses 2k and it has >5 psi by the time it hits 90 km/h. That's still <<2.5k rpm, so I think it's actually doing really well. Because of all the not-quite-ideal things that have been in place since the turbo first went on, it felt laggy. It's actually not. The response appears to be as good as you could hope for with a highflow.
    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
×
×
  • Create New...