Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i bought a motor and gearbox setup and just curious about it before i put it in my R31.

what i was told be the bloke i bought it off was he had it in his drift R31 car before he destroyed the rear end of the car

its aparently a VL turbo block with forged internals rb20 redtop head with rb26 internals in the head as i say wat i was told

and the gearbox is from an GT-R with the transfer case cut off and sealed up apparently they have a stronger centre shaft

hes said it was pushing 450hp-650hp depending on wat turbo/intercooler setup was used and recons it runs 500hp day in day out

now im just wondering if it could work, and or wat peoples opions are about it will attach a picture

post-64604-0-65934200-1295267075_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/350747-rb20-redtop-headrb30-block/
Share on other sites

ok i was told from someone else that a rb20 redtop head was the only 20 head that bolted straight on aswell as the r32 rb25

well sound like im one step up from before anyway lol cheers

it looks like a rb20 head to me in every way, as far as im aware the rb20s dont flow as much air due to the smaller valves.. without knowing exactly whats been done its hard to speculate what sort of power its capable of, but i guess 400-450hp may be more realistic than 650hp.. i would stick on a gt30r n see how it goes

People used to bolt rb20 heads to rb30 blocks in the old days (like, early 90's) because rb25 and 26 heads were still rare and prohibitively expensive. There is a lot more modding to do to the rb20 head to fit to the rb30 block (eg bore size is different) compared with the other conversions but people did it because they didn't have much choice in those days. Nowadays nobody does it for the reasons mentioned above.

In terms of flow, it stands to reason that the head and valvetrain would be modified because stock for stock, taking off the sohc head and putting on the 2.0 twin cam doesn't net that much of a benefit, you have to mod the 20 head to make the whole thing worthwhile IMO (which is what appears to have been done in this case).

it looks like a rb20 head to me in every way, as far as im aware the rb20s dont flow as much air due to the smaller valves.. without knowing exactly whats been done its hard to speculate what sort of power its capable of, but i guess 400-450hp may be more realistic than 650hp.. i would stick on a gt30r n see how it goes

It's definately a HR31 RB20 NICS Red top head. No doubt about it.

Not R32.

As for it being a 3ltr. Look @ the block number.

Either way a LOT of dicking around to get that kinda setup to work - as frankly, it doesn't without some serious time/effort and even then the results are poor as the head simply does not flow.

yer even silvertop heads arent worth it because they dont flow but using a NICS head, might aswell buy an excel....

you can see from the pic that its a 30 block, the tensioner has been relocated above the water pump.

i remember about 14 or so yrs ago there was a vl commo that ran a red top rb20 head. apparently theres alot of wok to get them to fit, but as said above back in the day they were the only cost effective option. have a poke around on the commodore forums u may be able to dig up some info.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...