Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ah ok i have pics of the RB30 which im told is the same as the RB25/26 but sorry cant confirm if the same as the ID2000, i don't see what would be so different though

  • Replies 163
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

here is an install guide from Simon Michealmore

>>Install into Neo<<

the injectors he used were full length ones the ones being supplied in the group buy a 3/4 length

So full length injectors require the 20mm spacers but they Neo injectors in the group buy don't?

I'll be in for a set of 60lb'ers for a Neo as soon as someone buys my 6boost manifold!

yes but its only the Bosch injectors that are 3/4 length but Simon in that thread has just bought the 80lb/h Siemens so spacing the fuel rail must be easy enough

Hey was just after a group buy like this, Well im looking at the EV14 1000cc Injectors for my R34 GTT a set of 6, Will these fit it up properly without height adapters or do i need them, Please let me know what wiring harness also i need to connect it up, i have a R34 GTT RB25DET NEO

I even want the Walbro GSS342 fuel pump, Can u let me know how much my total would be.. Cheers!!

hi Zaver the EV14 are a 3/4 length injector so you don't need height adapters

1x EV14 1000cc $580

1x set harness $66

1x shipping $25

1x walbro 342 $132

Total $803

steve if i get the id1000's do i need the height adaptors to run them with A/M fuel rail?

coz i would be down for a set of them!

sorry I'm not sure, I'm trying to find out

every time i think i have my head around injectors i find out i don't :D

i dare say you will but don't quote me :)

hey steve,

just double checking these will fit np with the stock plenum?? and ive already got a adjustable nismo fpr, so should be ok.

e85 here i come :)

oh, if its just a connection issue, should be ok, as there is a rubber tube between the rail and fpr, im sure ill work something out.

and since your going the e85 way, do only the three caltex servo sell e85?? i know there is that race shop that has it, but do any other servos??

there is a Liberty on Tapleys Hill Rd

are you familular with Simon Micheal mores S14 drift car with RB25 NEO engine

with a GT3076 and these 80lb/h injectors @ 19psi he made 397 rwkw on a hub pack dyno

182030_1752137996632_1034359196_1924784_1167039_n.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...