Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey Steve,

any issues with temps after the grout fill job?

Yo,

motor just got stripped down and reported on.....

Engine temps and water temps were fantastic whilst on track

max of ~90 degrees after each session (air guides/twin thermos air/breather tank were fabricated)

draw back.... concrete caused a hairline fracture upon setting (still tracked for 6 events after) :)

all parts in great condition, would reuse consumables if a street car but not taking any risks with new N1 block

:cheers:

Fire wall bars are cut that accuratly we can weld the tube back to the fire wall to seal it up, no cut plates required....

post-20349-0-65316300-1357544993_thumb.jpg

And on the inside shit just got wild

post-20349-0-85504400-1357544972_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-29056800-1357544984_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-70476700-1357545005_thumb.jpg

Hopefully finish off the front end of the cage tomorrow, few more bars to through to the strut towers and more chassis reinforcement to come.

First stage of this monster cage is now done.

Basicly there are plates welded to the area of the floor where the chassis rails are spot welded to the fire wall. The tubes running to those plates actually go through the plate and are welded to the inside of the actual chassis rail. The plate is then welded ontop to reinforce the rail to both the cage and the fire wall.

There is obviously tirangulation to those critical pick up points.

There is 3 bars running out to 3 points on the strut towers.

One horozontally out which will oppose the side intrusion. One out to the strut top and tower intersection which is X'ed inside the car and another from the base of the front leg to the side of the tower where the camber arms are bolted to.

The bar at the base of the front leg to the chassis rail bars is there for two reasons, one is to aid in a side impact, transfering the force to yet another strong point of the chassis and also to provide a triangulated support for the main rail support bar.

enough explaining, enjoy the first stage of what is probably the most comprehensive cage anyones ever put into a skyline.....

post-20349-0-28354700-1357631393_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-07192500-1357631402_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-77773200-1357631407_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-73332000-1357631412_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-54860100-1357631416_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-83838700-1357631419_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-05931000-1357631423_thumb.jpg

Steve mentioned people were asking him how the car was going.

Update, the cage is nearing completion, hopefully tomorrow the hoop will have its diagonals and the front bases plated up.

Fab work left is some new jacking points under the car, pedal box frame and install, seat mounting and a new steering coloum.

Then a rewire before being sent off for paint

post-20349-0-03858500-1358231799_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-79559900-1358231800_thumb.jpg

Back to the top for this one,

Its getting a face lift

post-20349-0-46256700-1357378574_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-98805600-1357378575_thumb.jpg

When someone drops a car like this off at pro fabrication and says I dunno what I want just make it good the wheels start to turn.

Ive designed and FEA tessted the following cage and thats whats going into this R34

Front section to strut towers

post-20349-0-70588500-1357379010_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-66834800-1357379012_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-91640400-1357379015_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-39359800-1357379019_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-76991800-1357379021_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-39872700-1357379024_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-45767600-1357379026_thumb.jpg

When you say 'FEA tested' what exactly have you done. I'm assuming a beam model of the cage minus chassis looking at torsional stiffness? How much optimisation is done (stiffness vs. weight) - I imagine there are diminishing returns when you start adding that much bar work.

Just cage modelling correct. We are mainly looking for ways to even out the load distribution and maximise torsional strength.

Weight vs ridgity is factored,

Obviously as you say there comes a point where the cage just becomes heavier without adding any strength. I questioned the small bars running from the base of the front leg to the chassis rail mounts. When removed we lost side impact resistance on the front leg. 1.1kg worth of bar that was worth while.

There wasn't much else that we tried which added any great benifit.

The only thing I'd like to have changed is the location of the X between strut towers. I think it should have been wider but engine restrictions prevented it.

The engineer we use to do these designs with us here always harps about intersection location. Problem is when you take the design to a car a lot of the time locations can't be exactly where they are desired.

I just seen your PM too ill send you a quote tomorrow.

Went in today for a seat fitting.... I have to say that the quality of the workmanship speaks for itself. To see it come together from scratch is truly amazing.

Motor duties have been appointed to PowerTune for a freshen up... N1 block now replacing the cracked concrete block. They were really impressed with the condition of the bottom end... Credit to the dry sump by PFRE and machine/assembly work carried out by Greg at Duncan and Foster.

  • 2 weeks later...

The rollcage is now completed and the body has been seam welded. Looks like a mess but once painted will be tidy.

The custom steering coloum is also finished.

We start with a shaped plate on the firewall and mount a spherical bearing and carrier to the plate.

Using 25x2.1mm 4130 tube the steering colum passes through the spherical into the engine bay.

I've machined up a basic 6061 series alluminium block to house the upper roller bearing in and support the end of the shaft.

More bar work from the bearing plate to the cage and bulk head support the coloum.

Modified sparco adaptor is welded into the shift and a roll pin is drilled and banged in for extra security.

This steering coloum is exactly how the V8 Supercar colums are done.

Pedal box mountings are underway but not completed yet, custom throttle pedal is also underway. We couldn't use a 3 pedal box due to the design of the cage. A custom pedal is being fabricated to clear the lower cage bars.

Fabricated pedal box mount completed. Reinforced with 1 inch 4130 tube back to the lower chassis rail support bars.

Decided today that the car is going to need some new jacking points under the car, the chassis rails have been squashed and the sils damaged from jacking the car up all the time at the track. Some specific jacking points coming from the cage will save the cars structure

post-20349-0-34760700-1359356355_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-90900700-1359356357_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-05585900-1359356360_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...