Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Selling a Tech Edge wide band meter.

Cheap and fun way to tune your own car or just to keep an eye on those A/F ratios.

Accuracy to within 0.1 which is plenty for street use.

See all the details here: http://wbo2.com/2j/2j1.htm

Connect to your laptop with the free software and monitor RPM, both knock sensors and A/F ratios. Only requires 3 wires to be connected to your ECU loom.

Cost me over $400 last year and has only done a few hundred kms. Im selling car and putting original ECU back in so this has to go.

Will sell for $250 firm. I will include registered postage to anywhere in Australia.

post-7878-0-00865800-1298369927_thumb.jpg

post-7878-0-53676700-1298369944_thumb.jpg

post-7878-0-69230100-1298369955_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/354846-tech-edge-wide-band-sensor/
Share on other sites

going off the picture there is no sensor and the rj45 plug has been cut off is this correct and its last years model which they no longer sell...

So I would need ot get a new bosch sensor, replace the rj45 connector and it should be right to go?

did you install this yourself, how hard is the install and do you need any software to hook it up to a laptop?

did you hook it up to your ecu at all? which ECU?

Sorry I should have mentioned that the sensor is still in the car. I need to jack it up to remove it and just havent got around to that yet. So YES the sensor is included. Can post a pic up as soon as I get it out.

I havent cut any plugs off. The grey wire you see with no end is the connections for the ECU. You just strip back the outer cover to get at the wires. There is another connector to attach your laptop with I havent included in the pic but here is a pic of it from the Tech Edge website. You either have the Display plugged in or the laptop into the grey wire with the black thingy on the end.

I installed it myself, was fairly straight forward. You need to find a wiring diagram for your ECU so you know which wires to tap into to. I was using it on a Power FC on my R33 GTSt. I tapped into the RPM, and both knock sensors, plus you get the A/F ratio from the sensor, so on the laptop I was graphing 4 inputs.

Software I used was free and available from the Tech Edge website. Have a look here: http://wbo2.com/sw/log.htm

post-7878-0-46954700-1299014728_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...