Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Tomorrow i get my new FMIC (Trust V-spl) installed and i am having a few thoughts about the increase in power.

It was Nissky's old car.

These are my current mods: -

RB20DET

R34 GTT Turbo (T3)

GTR fuel pump

Remapped computer

Apexi Super AVC-R (first edition, the black one)

2.5 inch turbo back exhaust

Air filter and BOV

Im running 2 levels of psi, 10.5 (.75bar) and 13.3 (.95bar)

Now my question is, with the new bigger intercooler, i should have 20-25kw more(correct me if im wrong) - will my engine/turbo be able to support these mods?

I really dont want the turbo to start leaning out and do rings :D

any help would be appreciated!

Cheers

Sean

Ive heard that installing a bigger FMIC allows the turbo to breath better, resulting in around 2 psi drop. Having a boost controller will keep the amount of psi at the same level it was before the bigger FMIC. Which should increase power levels.

Well that is what i have been told by people on this forum.

Originally posted by rob77

since when does adding a fmic increase HP? didnt for me, allowed me to run more boost in hotter temperature without detonation.

I agree with you rob77 when you say an intercooler allows you to run more boost safely in hotter temperatures (cooler air therefore less chance of detonation at the same boost levels). However I also thought that if you installed a decent aftermarket intercooler over the stock item and didn’t change anything else (boost levels etc) you would still get a performance increase due to the cooler and slightly denser air being inducted. Someone correct me if im wrong, only way to learn.

I think once u install the cooler because there is less pressure drop u will be getting higher boost pressures at the manifold, so more power. Even if u dont tuch the boost. Not 20-25kw though. Could be a reason.

Cheers

Guest INASNT

when i had stock cooler, safc, exhaust i got 155rwkw with 12 psi boost

I then threw on a 600x300x76 cooler and ran it on the dyno again without changing any setting on the safc and i got 183rwkw.

The standard cooler is a pile of poo and does not cooler the intake air/not drop pressure as much as a decent sized cooler, ie cooler the intake air = more power.

Funny that the fastest r33 on a stock turbo was run by a guy with a stock intercooler too. talk to rev210 I think it was a 13.3 on the stock turbo, intercooler, ecu and on 205/55 tyres. According to you lot with a bigger fmic you should go faster because your making more power right?

Guest Robo's

Well if i cant beat my time, i will go he!!

I havent got huge kw's, and my terminal speed is not alot either, give me more top end please..

On my runs, my car was pinging badly in 3rd and 4th. If i can stop the pinging and get some more rwkw, a good time will be on the cards. Traction is the key and some quick shifts!!

why dont you try the water injection kits that are sold at MRt, for 1000 dollars the aquamist will qaurentee your car wont ping through the gears at higher boost therefor giving you more power...... just a thoguht.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...