Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, trying to sell my complete car not running. however, if i dont get the price im after im willing to strip it as long as i have buyers for ALL the below items :)

Apexi Power Fc + Hand Controller for r33 rb25det - $1200

GCG gt34r Custom Garret Turbo kit with 1 bar actuator (slightly bigger then a highflow and cost $2700 with dump pipe brand new) - $1200

r34 550cc Deutchwerks injectors - $400

BuddyClub Coilovers Race Spec - $1000

r34 rb25det Gearbox with heavy duty clutch EXCELLENT CONDITION - $1300 or 1600 as a full manual conversion

IF i have buyers for ALL these, i will then also have the following for sale

r32 gtr seats, good condition with no tears - $450

HKS EVC 3 boost controller complete - $220

Blitz return flow FMIC (slightt damage but does NOT LEAK) - $200

Blitz DD bov with hot pipe - $120

Walbrow fuel pump - $120

z32 afm with plus - $170

Apexi Pod Filter - $50

r33 Series 2 front end (includes IMMACULATE headlights, bonnet, front bar, with foglight/indicators and reo) - $800

Apexi pen turbo timer - $100

Items located in Sydney, can post at buyer expense. However, as stated earlier, i must have a buyer for the first 5 items before i think of stripping a complete car. you can contact me on 0403 558 930.

Cheers

Zack

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355895-r33r34-rb25det-performance-parts/
Share on other sites

Id be interested in the HD Clutch if someone does want the Gear Box

Ill probably need a spare gearbox as mine has issues from Dyno time... $1000 for the box and sell the clutch to pmd89 for $300 :cheers:

all PMs replied. alot of interest guys. but once i have a sale on the first lot of items ill begin stripping. :)

and no, i wont sell the gearbox for a $1000. I AM NOT IN NEED OF MONEY. so the prices are fairly firm. im just tired of seeing it sit in my backyard for over a year :)

GEARBOX IS 1300 with or without clutch :)

mate if you read my post. You would notice im focusing on organising buyers for the Power Fc, Injectors, Turbo kit, gearbox, and coilovers first before i part out the rest of the car.

I have Pmed pix to those who have requested any of those parts. but i will take a pic of the evc3 for u tomorrow :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...