Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Southbound BP this time.

Was that a smokey and the bandit reference.

so where will you be heading after the meet. and ur talking bout the BP's on the highway yea?

Yeah the one between the ulman road and buchannans road exits we will meet there on thursday at 7pm I am unsure if we are doing dinner this week guess we will put it to a vote, we will rock down to castledine to grab chris and then make our way out to chapel hill Baskin and robbins to visit the westies for a bit then cruise back home.

We will put a stop in at pizza capers (castledine cnr of gympie rd and beams road ) at 7:30 this will allow those who are hungry to grab a quick feed, and someone to collect Chris (If he is still comming that is if the subi isn't up and running).

Then we will proceed down to Chapel Hill B&R

I am coming. doing radiator in the subaru now. all going well and theis new 50mm alloy jobbie fits in the hole tyhen I will be driving. if not them I wil tag along with someone.

troy,

I have your dash and light switch here :)

Ohai.

I might not b able to make it, long story short.

Couple nights ago my dog woke us up barking at 11 ish, i went to the door to calm him down when i noticed threw thr fence ( the wooden ones where there is a 10-20mm gap) that there was a crouched shadow. ( dark time, lights lit up).

I tgen jumped the fence but couldnt see anyone. Thought i was imagining it untill i turned all the lights off n sat in the same position.

I could see straight threw the fence, someone was looking into my yard.

My partners scared of being alone. She finishes work at 9pm. So we will c wat happens.

On a sife note, bought a 27inch monitor. Fk yea

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...