Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I need to know if anyone has had any bad experiences ( performance wise ) after rebuilding an RB20DET especially with regards to forged pistons or having head work done on an RB20DET ?

I've just had my engine rebuilt with 40 thou oversize forgies and port / polish work on the head and now with more boost, fuel etc. the car's making less power on the dyno than it did before the rebuild. Nothing else has been changed.

I'm stumped. :confused:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/35899-rb20-rebuild-questions/
Share on other sites

As far as I know it was checked while the car was on the dyno and all was well.

I think I might triple check it myself because it and the crank angle sensor are the only things that I can think of at the moment that might be the problem ( outside of the rebuild ).

What was done in the way of head work? Also was the compression ratio changed with the forged pistons?

Its possible that the thing wont make the same amount of power depending on what was done with regards to headwork/std cams, drop in compression, change in weight of reciprocating mass etc etc.

Same Dyno???

Roy & Joel,

Yes it was the same dyno and there was nothing really done apart from the head was ported ( mainly above the valve area, polished up somewhat, and the seats were cut to a larger size.

Other than that the only things that were done were the balancing of the bottom end and a set of Arias forged pistons ( 40 thou oversized ).

I asked them about the possibility of compression ratio drop and I pretty much got a blank expression and I did tell them 3 times throughout the build that I did not want monster power. Just wanted more torque and a bit more power than standard but I think they've gone overboard. I've got a horrid gut feeling that another head will be required to fix this problem because I don't have the money for cams, bigger turbo, more dyno time etc, etc. :P

That's a distinct possibility in my opinion but that's what I'm either trying to prove or disprove so I know if I can either place the blame back on the engine builder and get him to fix it ( since I specifically told him/them that I wanted a build that would make the most of what I had but would not require more $'s in the future to make the build work ). I have put it to the builder and he swears that it should all work fine. Guess again.............

That's why I'm looking for someone who's built an RB20DET in much the same way as me and is running a GT2530, injectors, and a programmed ECU and see if any similar problems occured.

So frustrating...........

Could very well be a drop in compression ratio thats doing it. Perhaps get the details of the Purchase order of the mechanic and chase Rocket / Arias with the purchase order no in hand and get the details of the piston that was supplied.

Then do the calcs of what the compression ratio should now be.

Can a drop in compression ration make that much difference ??????

The engine builders are going to do a difference check between stock pistons a nd the ones I got to see what the difference will be.

I've never done a cylinder volume test before ( from memory ). How's it done ?

Assuming that the engine actually has a lower CR, what would be the fix ?

A bigger turbo ?

Its fairly easy to get a rough idea where the comp ratio is at.

Pop down to the library pull out a gregory's or similiar Car manual, anything a ford falcon.

Have a look at what the psi should be then check the compression ratio. It may say something like 155psi 9:1cr.

Then do the math, test your compression. You may get 140psi.

So... 9/155psi = 0.0581

Then 140 * 0.0581 = 8.1CR.

Thats just an example. I have no idea if 155psi = 9:1.

I did that when I first got my R32 and it came up to exactly 8.5:1.

I also used a EL Ford Falcon manual to get the initial figures from.

I'm not sure if its possible but can the block be decked while the bits that go round and round are installed?!? Shave the head?!? Thinner Head gasket??

Also for every .5of a CR you drop you will need to run an extra ~2.9psi to make the same power.

Joel,

Thanks for that info. Will try to figure it out. Got this horrid feeling that there's going to be a huge brawl in getting this all sorted :D

I don't know about the other points you proposed but I guess I'm going to have to look at those options now.

Gee's it's not like I can even get a bigger turbo and run more boost since there's a standard head gasket fitted.

Thanks for that RedDrifter.

So if I'm correct, a stock RB20DET should have a compression ratio of 8.5:1 and 140psi on a compression test. With that in mind I'll do a comp test on mine and do the formular.

In the event that my comp ratio is down and I should choose to go a bigger turbo, does anyone have an opinion on what I should use ?? ( Considering the head work and 40 thou oversized forgies )

Good thing I am going to do most off the stuff myself.

I intend going with tomei 2.2 pistons, tomei 260duration 8.5mm lift cams and tomei valve springs for reliablity up in the revs. Oh yeah 550cc injectors and GT2835.

I have every intention taking a good 12 months to complete this project. That way I won't notice the cost so much. As for the bearings etc and gaskets will go genuine nissan.

FAT32, just rip the head off and machine the face a little to bump up the compression, IF thats the problem.

Oh and you are making less power... what ECU are you running, if its std, and the same tune as before then that could very well be the source of the power loss, you have changed the breathing characteristics of the engine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...