Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I own a s13 silvia, which is fairly modded in terms of suspension, brakes and all the rest, and I have put a rb20 in it which has a high flowed turbo, front mount and a few other things like after market bov and is running 18pound. I'm at the point where i need to buy a aftermarket comp and im wondering whether i should bother, or build up a decent motor.

THese are my options; I own another rb20 block, 26 crank, rods and would buy a 26 head. I believe that because the bore is the same across the rb range, and only the stroke is different (apart from block differences,more modern as they progress) that I could buy forged rods (decrease the stroke) and dome top pistons (increase the subsequently lowered comp ratio) and get closer to a 2.5/2.6 litre that revs harder than a 26 and of course a 30 (as the 30 is limited by its stroke) and avoid the older tech of the 30 block, and get away from the oiling problems of the early 26's. By going to a twin high mount turbo set up (splitting the exhaust with firing order in mind, same as the 26). By changing the head studs to something stronger, and running a thicker metal gasket, the volume increase, and a subsequent compression loss occurs, allowing ultimately for more boost (due to the lower compression) and the twin turbo's will lend themselves to the lower comp, given that they will kick in earlier (than a large single) and make up for the lower na power prior to boost.

Essentially This first option would be a hybrid 26ish, except substituting the block for a rb20 and making up the for the volume difference in bore, stroke, and piston caps, all things that would be changed in a serious 26 or 30 build.

The second option would be to opt for a tradition 26 head and 30 block (there is something to be said for following a trend, look at the vl turbo's quarter times)

and maybe a third option would be building up a late model 26.

P.s guys i apologize for the dodgy shit, that's been going up the last few days, a mate hacked me and put up all the crap.

Your american arn't you...

better do a little more research mate.

Justin

Na dude, I'm australian, research with regards to what?

Edited by Overnight Parts From Japan

Rb bore sizes are the same for rb25/26/30

rb20's have a smaller bore champ.

Sorry my bad, just checked and your right, do you know if they are able to be bored out to 86?

you might be able to get it out to 82, but to make the 26 head fit (if it is indeed possibl) you would have to use bore sleeves.

I like the idea mate, but being limited to the RB20 head is probably your greatest downside in this project: read: there would be expensive headwork involved in properly taking advantage of the increased output ?

what does everyone else think ?

Dude - search function.

Put "RB24" into it. Watch the joyus results roll in.

There are entire threads listing in detail exactly what parts you need, what needs to be done and so on.

For the price, RB25. RB24 is simply not worth the money as you'll soon see by searching and reading past threads about it. Hence there are very little.

Thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...