Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ppls.

I'm looking at the Apexi GT Spec Cooler.

Who has one, and what were their results after fitting and how complete was the kit as supplied?

Did you have to make any modifications to it at all??

CHEERS

PETE

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/36357-apexi-gt-spec-coolers/
Share on other sites

Rather not many people use them (most here seem to use V-Spl or a HKS Type-S), great coolers, great kits, piss easy fit (even easier than the V-Spl from memory) but $$$ as usual.

T.

from memory RH9, the R34 GTR that was a customer of crd used one, they seem to be a good cooler

Bass Junky

The Apexi GT coolers are AWESOME........ I speak in regards to wrx's here (but their quality is outstanding over all products so it would be safe to say the the same coupld be said for a skyline)

They OWN Trust coolers - the reason that not many people run them is that they are a little harder to fit - on a rex they require the battery moved and some chopping on the front bar. The addition farking around is well worth it in the long term as the coolers are superior.

The reason the Trust coollers seem to be more popular I believe is simply a matter of Simplicity and looks. As the Trust coolers are alot easier to fit and come in that slighty polished look which the ricers love, where as the apexi has a silver mat finish.....

Daniel

The project R34 from HPI used an apexi GT spec cooler. The cooler had a return pipe passing underneath/behind the cooler and coming back up into the stock pipes in the engine bay which is simular to my trust unit. At the end of the day most of the australian coolers do the job well and usually for a cheaper price (unless you go through nengun). If its going to end up costing you more than $1500 I'd have a look around for whats available locally.

rob77

Im a big believer in buying reputable Japenese products (FMIC inparticular) over locally made stuff. For the simple fact that companies like HKS and Apexi (im not talking all Jap brands here) spend millions on reserch and development - testing flow, cooling efficiency, end tank design, etc... I would always purchase a researched and tested product over one that a local shop whacks up..having said that I do believe that their are a few aussi shops that make outstanding products.

At the end of the day I would also pay more for the Jap stuff than the local stuff.

Daniel

Well I ordered my trust cooler from the workshop here as at the time I wasnt completely aware of nengun and I also didnt want to go through the hassle of having it shipped here and being hit with GST and duty or having it arrive with a big dent or hole in it. I paid $2500 for it, if I knew what I knew today then I would have just gone with a local made core. I too believe that the japanese equipment is better than the local equipment, but I dont think its worth the extra I paid for the cooler. Having said that I also have the trust turbo and blitz boost controller matched to a turbosmart wastegate and a wolf3d ecu and so far the package has worked extremely well... I just cant wait for the rebuild to be finished, the engine run in and around 1.2-1.4bar dialed in :)

I have the rspl not the vspl kit that nengun has been sending in. The rspl is a better core with end tanks/piping that come back under the cooler so that it uses the stock cooler pipes into the engine bay... ie: very litte modification and thus costs more, but you're right $2500 is a tad rich. I havent run the 1/4 recently, lasttime I went down I could only manage a 13.8 with a 2.7s 60' time at around 115mph. As you can see I cant drive :) I kept on changing too early and the turbo kept falling off boost. I'm waiting till the engine is done then we are having a Drag Combat day where the track will be fully prepped, I expect to run low 12's on street tyres... maybe a high 11, just need to get in a few good runs and get the launch right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...