Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So here I am daydreaming again, this time about the upcoming (?) new rotary engine from Mazda, the 16X.

Summary:

2 x 800cc rotors

Direct injection

Increased compression

More fuel efficient

(probably less revs)

Here's my dreams/guestimations/predictions....

MX5 with 16X (NA), Torque 270Nm. Power 187kw @7300rpm

RX8 with same engine and hybrid drive. (http://www.roadandtrack.com/future-cars/2014-mazda-rx-8)

RX7 with 16X single turbo (mild boost 8psi). Torque 370Nm. Power 235kw @6800rpm. Weight 1260kg (2 seater only with rear luggage bench).

Here's hoping they build something like these.

With light weight and direct injection the rotary could be quite decent on fuel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364936-mazda-16x-rotary/
Share on other sites

I just hope they keep the rotary engine available. Its always nice know that some manufacturers are still making sports cars.

Take note toyota, honda & mitsubishi (if you sre still going to kill off the evo).

Edited by gtr fan

Mazda has doubled the number of engineers on the rotary in the last 12 months. So it appears to be something that IS happening. The completely fresh design, direct injection and longer stroke should make it use a LOT less fuel....as long as they only go into light cars.

Although the RX8 was comparatively light it was still too heavy for the 13B. The 16X should have about 30% more torque.

Please please put it in an MX5, then turbo and put into a 2-seater RX7.

Why bother putting it into a mx5? They already have nice little engines that turbo/supercharge up plenty as it is. Easier to do that than to do an engine conversion.

No I'm saying Mazda should do it. Would be very easy for them. Apparently Mazda UK has put in an expression of interest to Mazda HQ for said car.

And a turbo/supercharged 4-cyl isn't really that comparable to a NA rotary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...