Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if any members live around the Cudlee creek area, and based on the fact there only 700ish people there would know of the bloke who's car I am looking at... Name is Michael Gray, the car is a GU Patrol Ti.. have recieved this e-mail back after enquiring about it.

I confirm that the car is immaculate technically and aesthetically speaking.

There is no outstanding finance on the car, also the car comes with a full service history and RWC.

The last price, including door to door delivery, is $12800.(with shipping costs included!)

I love this car and i am very upset at having to sell it,it has served me well but i just moved to High Wycombe, WA and i can't afford to keep it and i need the money fast so i can pay off some debts.

The car was advertised on eBay as well and i will run the transaction only under their terms and conditions for our own protection.

A deposit of $4900 is requiered to buy my car and reserve it for you.

We will use eBay Buyer Protection Program (BPP) which will hold the deposit until you receive the car.

Your funds will be 100% insured by eBay.

You will have 5 days inspection period, so you'll be able to see and inspect the car before buying it.

If you don't like the car after inspection or is not as i've describe it, you can reject the deal.

If you need more information regarding the transaction just visit the following web page from eBay 's website :

http://www.ebay-australia-buyer-protection.au-overviews.com/Carsales/

If you are interested in this car please provide me the following details in order to start the transaction through eBay :

-Your Full Name and Shipping Address

-Your eBay ID

-Any negative feedback and if so .... for what reason .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/365089-nsw-forumer-looking-for-some-help/
Share on other sites

yeah, have since reported it to Carsales... I thought the ad had been written by an idiot who didn't know what their car was, but the strange details combined with this e-mail... back looking for a car..

Keeping the conversation going while I wait for carsales to pick up the report, but just VERY slowly... Was aware the car was worth more like 22k, but as I said, thought it was just an idiot seller. Oh well...

from a patrol perspective, something doesnt add up

thats at least an 04-05 model pictured, the 1998 model with a petrol engine wouldnt have had a 4.8 twin cam, would have had a 4.5 single cam. following a few other details in the pics, thats definitely a series 3 GU 4.8..........easily still a high 20k / low 30k car. and not to mention in the 4th picture theres an ST decal, :laugh:

i smells a scam

and maybe a fart :sick:

Thanks Matt, I figured the seller was an idiot, all the shots are the same car.. But has the ST stickers, TD bonnet, TI interior, 4.8 motor, is listed as 4.5l 4.8 Petrol Diesel.. Was aware it had to be 10/01 onwards, and that it was a $25+k car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...