Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey people ive got a couple left over parts from a build, prices are negotiable, and parts r located in the northern subs of melbourne, shipping will be at buyers expense but pick up is preferred.

more photos can be taken upon request, n i can be contacted on 0412 570 952 or on pm..

item: r32 nismo turbos 14411-06U00 include hks style dumps

for: rb26

cost: $800

condition: very good condition no shaft play.

comment: upgrading as ive built a new engine, made 264rwkw on 16psi

th_IMG_5927.jpg

th_IMG_5924.jpg

th_IMG_5921.jpg

item: rb25 head

for: rb25

cost: $200

condition: good condition, been sitting for bout a year tho

comment: also have rb25 cams

th_IMG_5954.jpg

th_IMG_5952.jpg

item: rb26 std cams

for: rb26

cost: $50

condition: good condition

comment: came off my r32

th_IMG_5929.jpg

item: std rb26 cam gears

for: rb26

cost: $20

condition: great condition

comment: came off my r32

th_IMG_5948.jpg

item: rb26 std pistons n rods

for: rb26

cost: $100

condition: good condition

comment: went with forgies

th_IMG_5960.jpg

item: defi gauges

for: universal

cost: $400

condition: excellent condition, but no control unit

comment: oil pres, oil temp, water temp, ext temp.

th_IMG_5932.jpg

item: nismo gmax twin plate clutch

for: rb26 pull type

cost: $600

condition: good condition

comment: plenty of meat left. includes flywheel

th_IMG_5956.jpg

item: rb26 std intake plenum

for: rb26

cost: $100

condition: very good

comment: could do with a clean haha

th_IMG_5938.jpg

item: std r32 radiator

for: r32

cost: $50

condition: good condition

comment: also have the shroud which is also in decent condition

th_IMG_5946.jpg

th_IMG_5950.jpg

item: hicas lock bar

for: r32

cost: $40

condition: brand new

comment: could also fit many other nissan

th_IMG_5955.jpg

item: 2 steering wheels

for: r32

cost: $50 each

condition: great

comment: includes boss

th_IMG_5916.jpg

th_IMG_5912.jpg

dont hesitate to hit me up if u have any questions.

Thanks

Andrew

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367058-r32-gtr-rb26-rb25-nismo-defi/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...