Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Have had the opportunity to buy back a car a built many years ago for less than half its value, so am folding up the JZR33 project.

Car is a 93 GTS-T, gunmetal in colour, manual, 138ks, IMMACULATE interior and VERY GOOD CONDITION exterior. M spec front bar, S1 and S2 wing supplied, east bear side skirts.

Not repairable write off, not defected, clear title, etc.

What its missing:

Long motor

Coilpacks

Fuel rail/injectors

AC pump

Alternator

Exhaust manifold/turbo/full exhaust

Gearbox/mount/crossmember/fork/speedo drive/reverse switch

Brake calipers/rotors/softlines

WHAT IS NOT MENTIONED IS ON/IN THE CAR.

Pics to come, it is very tidy and will not disapoint.

Price is $2000, very firm.

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370326-fs-r33-rolling-shell-nsw/
Share on other sites

First photo, taken just before the motor was stripped (thus being in the backyard not the front).

Has sat around for a while since but otherwise same condition bar a wash and wax.

Rims NOT included, but ill sort something to come with it.

post-43588-0-55028800-1310097656_thumb.jpg

Would suit someone whos smashed theirs and wants to SAVE money repairing it OR someone whos car just isnt as tidy as mine and also wants to make money.

Remember you buy mine, swap your motor/box/brakes and part yours out for quite possibly more than your outlay on mine. No way there isnt 2k worth of bits on even a smashed shell, I just dont have the time, space or heart to wreck mine.

More photos for those who seem to think the cars a transformer, looks good in one photo and turns into trash monster extreme in the next.

Enjoy.

post-43588-0-47436300-1310362245_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-44788200-1310362249_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-70267000-1310362253_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-90087600-1310362257_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-30476900-1310362263_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-76452800-1310362269_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-20141500-1310362273_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-86652700-1310362278_thumb.jpg

Haha thanks mate.

You could come up for the drive and take a look, if u like it hire a trailer while your here and return it to a Vic Depot. Don't think it would cost more than 400 in fuel and hire, hell when you see the boot full of spares you'll be laughing at the value!

Take care mate :)

Haha, mate I think everyones just waiting on their tax return.

Would you believe I had some bawk at the fact its got no motor or box lol.. Like didnt you read the thread buddy?

More like they wanted the opportunity to act bashed and offer me a 3 digit figure LOL *sigh* :rolleyes:

lol thanks mate,

Everyones waiting on that infamous tax cheque!

Anytime soon haha

EDIT: turns out the car only has 127ks! Dunno how I got that mixed up but I hadnt looked in a while.

DEPOSIT TAKEN!

Going to a good home, am happy for that.

Thanks to all interested and sorry I couldnt help get everyones cars back on the road for such a good price :( First in best dressed I'm afraid.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...