Jump to content
SAU Community

Few Bother To Contribute To Government's Official Classification Debate


Recommended Posts

If you've ever wondered why government and legislators so routinely ignore the numerous protestations and objections made by gamers and those against internet filtering, you'd be well advised to look at the Australian Law Reform Commission's (ALRC) list of public submissions. The Issues Paper has been published since May 20 and as yet only 80 public submissions have been made - 80 per cent of them from people who believe in government intervention for the sake of child protection. Considering, the furious debates within Australia's technology communities, does this reflect the national balance? One can hardly blame the ALRC for the low, one-sided turnout either. It joined Twitter and Facebook and has regularly engaged with and promoted articles that deal with the matter. Yet, for all the huffing and puffing and commenting online about how much people can't stand the existing classification system, there are hardly any official complaints.

This begs several questions. Is it any wonder that technology enthusiasts and gamers get ignored by politicians and legislators when they don't voice their concerns in the right place? Or is it, that for all the ALRC's attempts at asking for public submissions, it should be using comments on internet message boards as a gauge for Australian community standards?

That second question is a joke, by the way. Ugh. Can you imagine?

In reality, it's likely down to the media for failing to inform the public on the matter, although the media will say that it hasn't been marketed to in the usual ways. It's a vicious, yet pathetic circle.

Ultimately, if you do care about internet filtering, games classification and general classification in any way, you'd do well to heed that the ALRC's classification review closes in just a few days on July 15. To get involved go to the official website, read the Issue Paper's questions. Answer them. And remember to submit them! The ALRC states, "We can see that many of you have begun answering the questions, and saved the form, perhaps intending to complete it at a later time."

http://www.abc.net.a.../06/3262712.htm

Make an online submission here. Done many of these submissions before so I don't see much happening but what the hell another one cannot hurt right? Only 3 days left to submit.

Well no-one does it as you have to "register" which is a load of fken shit.

I've done it either way. Fken BS GOVT

That's so they have a register of those pro 18+ gamers who are obviously terrorist and will one day be a threat to the nation and it's children

Also if you click make a submission you don't need to register

Doesn't matter how easy the government makes it, most of the gamers who aren't happy about it would rather whinge on a forum and have interaction from other people than make a submission which they don't see directly affecting anything. Realistically though the submission is what will be taken into consideration by the people that have the power to initiate change. The government will never make everyone happy and in this issue it seems to me like they are doing all they can to make the majority happy (if they spend a fortune on advertising the issue the majority of Australians will complain, if they called a national vote almost everyone complains). Maybe the solution is some kind of government moderated internet forum but I imagine that would be extremely difficult to sort out. That's my 2 cents anyway.

Edited by *LOACH*

It was not advertised. That is the problem. There are plenty of gamers who would fill it out. Saying most would rather a forum is generalising.

The article makes the point that the government has tried to get the involvement of gamers by various means including Facebook, Twitter and promoting related articles. If the government has to pay to advertise in mass media etc every time public submissions are sort for every bit of legislation that is under review the cost would be phenomenal. If they only advertise a small percentage of the requests for submissions I cant imagine the issue of game classifications being prioritised. Public health, education, foreign policy etc etc would be seen as requiring the funds. There has to be a point a which individuals make the effort to affect change rather than just blaming the government. In this issue, at this time, my opinion is the government has done its part in trying to get public input.

The article makes the point that the government has tried to get the involvement of gamers by various means including Facebook, Twitter and promoting related articles. If the government has to pay to advertise in mass media etc every time public submissions are sort for every bit of legislation that is under review the cost would be phenomenal. If they only advertise a small percentage of the requests for submissions I cant imagine the issue of game classifications being prioritised. Public health, education, foreign policy etc etc would be seen as requiring the funds. There has to be a point a which individuals make the effort to affect change rather than just blaming the government. In this issue, at this time, my opinion is the government has done its part in trying to get public input.

I understand that but its not hard to get free publicity. the article says that only 80 submitted at the time of its posting we are now in the hundreds and almost cracking the 1000's. If this article started back on the 20 may just think of the submission count it would be at if it was advertised there from the start.

All it would have taken is 1 little email to a major online/gaming site and the submissions would be a lot more than what they are at now.

Edited by Cozi

I'm with Cozi. I didn't read about it on any gaming website or magazine and they would spruik it if it was advertised. All it takes is the government to email a notice out to the gaming media. They didn't because they don't want our opinion.

But how do the government select which privately owned media groups to inform? The ones that aren't informed will complain they weren't informed. The mass media may hear about it and research it and find out that at some point in time a government official had shares or something in one of the companies that were informed. Then the mass media run it as an issue of corruption in the government. I could be wrong but I think that when magazines etc notify readers about government issues it is through the magazines research that the information is found. I imagine it is government policy not to directly contact individual companies but instead to use the means they have already tried in the classification review. There are many avenues available for individuals to attempt to impact political party's policy.

That's rubbish. Next publishing owns several mags. As you are not a journo, its expected you won't understand. You imagine but government does press conferences... how does the press know to turn up? They don't just sense politician fear and nibblies....

That's rubbish. Next publishing owns several mags. As you are not a journo, its expected you won't understand. You imagine but government does press conferences... how does the press know to turn up? They don't just sense politician fear and nibblies....

You might want to check your facts first. The press release for the review of classification laws was issued on the 21 December 2010 which included an invitation for public comment by the Attorney-General’s Department . At around that time you could also subscribe to receive regular updates on the progress of the review.

The point I was arguing is that if the government was to send an email to 1 major online/gaming site (as suggested by Cozi) then the government is seen to be showing favoritism. You suggested "email a notice out to the gaming media". Specifically who are they supposed to email? Whoever gets left out will claim it is unfair and that their product/website suffered by not having access to the same information at the same time.

Edited by *LOACH*

I really don't think any gaming site would see it as favoritism though more so just trying to get the word out. Most people that hang around the major gaming sites are generally apart of multiple not just one so the word would spread fairly quickly. One thing that all major online gaming sites do agree on is that a change is needed to the current system because it is wrong. If one of them ran with an article that "we didn't get a direct email so we are now pissed" I think they would get flamed fairly quickly because at the end of the day all the government was trying to do was get word out to the people that really care.

Loach maybe you don't get it. A press conference doesn't populate itself, invites are sent. Do you realise the government knows of every registered commercial magazine and news body... they do tax after all?

The government would certainly have the power to get it out there if they really wanted to. All it would have taken is a mailout to the database of a single popular gaming website and it would spread like wildfire. This article alone will do more for a response than any of the government's initiative towards it.

Have a look at the way it's setup though...most gamers ARE lazy people. If we weren't we'd be playing sport instead of sitting on a chair pointing and clicking. Game classification is also not a life threatening issue, not for us...we complain about it, but we aren't passionate enough that we're going to actively seek out a form we have to register for just to notify the government of our opinion that they may or may not listen to. The people who WILL do that are, surprise surprise, the 80% of submissions who are your typical sad case "think of the children" nothing better to do than devote hours of time towards campaigning a non issue. Which is why we have problems with classification in the first place. Yet it may still weigh in as a key factor for electoral decisions when us gamers are forced to get off our asses and vote for a politician, to have our say then. So, government SHOULD heed warning and make the process both simpler and better known. Seems to me all they wanted was a blame vehicle: "we set up something for you and you didn't do anything with it, and those who did were against you."

As for favouritism...it's not a prize, it's a community announcement. I highly doubt they are going to care, particularly if attempts are made to contact a few of the biggest ones...and really, I could achieve that for the government in the space of 2 hours and I'll charge them all of $500 to do it. Even still, so one news source gets a 24 hour head start on it...this happens with news of any kind anyway. Games websites are read by the owners and researchers of other games websites. They inter-report and most of the clientele aren't just loyal to one website.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1680, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...