Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You will be hard pressed to find any on this forum with those turbos in a twin setup.

You would also assume anyone with those turbos would be thinking about power more than they are lag. Most people on this forum would consider ONE of them laggy making a little over 300rwkw. Two would be shy of double and obviously very laggy.

GL

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5912378
Share on other sites

Yeah single form you are in the 300-330rwkw region on PULP.

So two of them, 650rwkwwould be a rough place to start the guess work.

If a 3076, smaller than a 3040... comes on round 3000-3300rpm in .86 form on a high comp 3lt, you'd expect about 6000rpm in twin, which won't have high comp given the boost that'll need to be used.

Depends on rear housinsg being used of course.

Hope there if a rev limit of 10,000 at a minimum :D

You chasing 600rwkw+ or not?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5912565
Share on other sites

Some people consider that 2530s and GTRSs and GT2835s and GT3037s can be a bit lazy in twin form on an RB26 .

I think GTRSs is as far as I'd go on anything with number plates even on a 2630 .

IMO from the GT3037/GT3076R and up is getting a bit extreme on anything other than a single purpose drag car . Like most I've read articles on the Japanese with their denuded slingshot cars but they are not something most would want to use for anything else , basically bloody useless except for the very rich on a drag strip .

It takes a lot more that two bigish turbos to make a GTR a drag king .

I couldn't imagine an engine that was a clapped out Camry one to 6500 revs then an unguided missile thereafter .

Anyway on paper the HKS spec GT"3040"R , todays speak called a GT3082R , is a better one than the one Garrett generally markets though they've been around long enough its exclusivity rights to be over .

I'll look up the numbers later so you know how to ID each type .

The only real difference aside from a HKS turbine housing is the compressors trim which is 50 on the HKS variant and 56 on the one Garrett usually sells . Same comp housing same center section .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5912825
Share on other sites

The cartridge numbers for the GT3040/GT3082R are 700177-9 for the 50 compressor trim HKS spec version and 700177-14 for the 56 compressor trim version Garrett usually push .

Sadly the 56T one was very common and there are a fair number of them in circulation .

My HKS list quotes the GT3037S 56T (port shrouded comp cover version same as GT3076R Pn 700382-12) as being 480 PS and their spec version of the GT3040/GT3082R (50 comp trim one) as 500 PS .

The reality of the matter is that half an RB26s 2568ccs or 1284cc isn't a lot to have to spin up a 500 odd horsepower turbocharger . Try to imagine a GT3040 on a Suzy GTi 1300 .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5914621
Share on other sites

Correction **bottom of the mop bucket.

ive heard Hayabusa turbo's are pretty safe. i mean they only lift the front wheel from the power until about 280km/h n then its pretty stable...:worship:

http://www.youtube.c...FC7ADCDEBC9CF8E

Edited by jjman
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5915090
Share on other sites

ive heard Hayabusa turbo's are pretty safe. i mean they only lift the front wheel from the power until about 280km/h n then its pretty stable...:worship:

http://www.youtube.c...FC7ADCDEBC9CF8E

Exactly the reason that twins on a 26 will be sweet, just raise the rev limit another 7000rpm and wheel stand goodness at 280km/h.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5915095
Share on other sites

Actually Busa engines are not in short supply 2nd hand . You go down to your local wrecker and say I'll have that one , they wipe the blood and hair off and box it up for you .

The point I make is that 1000 horsepowers worth of turbochargers is pretty extreme for a 2568cc car engine if its used on the street .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/370855-hks-3040/#findComment-5915869
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...