Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Hot4`s/ JapanesseMotorsport , did a write up years back on using a Mazda RX7 turbo Core and exhaust wheel and To4 compressor wheel .. Has any one used this turbo set up .. as it seemed a good stage 1 up grade from the Std RB ceramic Turbo.. If any one has a good stage 1 turbo up grade for the RB25 around 200kw at the wheels .. let me know .. Cheers cameron

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37168-rb25-rx7-hybrid-turbo/
Share on other sites

ive just built this turbo for myself.. Funny this.. I was going to ask but didnt bother.

I got a rx7 turbo given to me with hitachi core... and i got a t04 60 front cover with backing plate with i believe is a 60mm ??? not too sure... its 6.0ar or something...

Anyway i stumbled across a 300zx rear housing single turbo vg30 and sent the turbo down to a guy in sydney who put new size bearings in it and machined out the rear housing and cropped the rear wheel and fit the t04 front.. all this for around $700

This turbo should flow lots of HP as apparently the rear is supposed to be a .84 which is a decent size rear....

Anyone have an idea on what HP it would run on a rb25det pfc frmc etc etc

So you'll be using VG30DET turbine housing and stock RB25DET compressor housing?

would this upgrade be possible using the standard RB25DET rear housing?

Just wondering which RX7 turbo would you use?

Isnt the series VI and above twin turbo?

Im guessing its the ones before that?

I did this to my Skyline about 2 years ago... Response is only marginally worse, and the car made an extra 20-25rwkw (this was with cooler,pfc,exhaust,etc). Peak power was 206 rwkw from memory.

IMO - If you're pulling the turbo off yourself (like I did) then it's a worthwhile thing to do, however if you're paying someone to do it, save a bit more and buy a turbo that gives you more room to grow.

When you have 200rwkw - 200rwkw isn't enough! :(

Cheers,

matt

I actually changed the front housing to a T4 60 a/r front with t4 wheel it looks massive.

rear is a large 300zx vg30 single turbo housing machined out to suit the rx7 rear wheel.

my old turbo was a small vl with a t4 front wheel machined into it and it mate 213 rwkw so im sure this upgrade with the larger rear housing and rear wheel and larger front housing would bag allot more RWKW ???

So you'll be using VG30DET turbine housing and stock RB25DET compressor housing?

would this upgrade be possible using the standard RB25DET rear housing?

Just wondering which RX7 turbo would you use?

Isnt the series VI and above twin turbo?

Im guessing its the ones before that?

Yeah I am using the larger 300zx vg30 rear housing.. but you can use the RB25DET housing if you want. There are 2 types of rb25det housings one is bigger then the other. If you got the big one then it would be good you just got to get it machined out to suit (not 100% sure if the housing is big enough to fit the rx7 rear wheel.)

so really this turbo of mine is a 60 front and .84 rear.. i think...

the water lines fit fine.. the oil in on the turbo needs an adapter put on it that will allow you to use a banjo fitting oil line then it fit without any hassles.

after a cooler upgrade and this turbo the car has more power on 5psi then it had on 10psi

so both Series 4 or 5 core would work?

would the oil and waterlines need to be modified?

What kind of compressor wheel are you using? and how's the response with the turbo?

I dont know what the compressor wheel is the front is a garret t04 6.0A/R it would have a 55mm wheel? 60mm?.. but it looked really big compared to the old rx7 front wheel....

The rx7 rear wheel is massive, compared to the vg30 rear wheel it looks over twice the size... It was also cropped

you could easily build this turbo for under $900

post your email adress's i can send photos of the turbo

My partner built this turbo for a friends vl a couple of years ago.

Vg30 exhaust housing, Rx7 core and exhaust wheel, T04E compressor, .60 comp cover. it made 237rwkw on a standard vl turbo motor on 15psi. Mods were 550cc injectors cooler,computer etc. Using the V-trim compressor would be better again. i'm probally going to use this on my R31.

I did this to my Skyline about 2 years ago...  Response is only marginally worse, and the car made an extra 20-25rwkw (this was with cooler,pfc,exhaust,etc).  Peak power was 206 rwkw from memory.  

 

IMO - If you're pulling the turbo off yourself (like I did) then it's a worthwhile thing to do, however if you're paying someone to do it, save a bit more and buy a turbo that gives you more room to grow.

 

When you have 200rwkw - 200rwkw isn't enough! :P

 

Cheers,

 

matt

i too agree, i alll too often see these hybrids on customers/friends cars and they are usually dissapointing, especially as $900-1100 on some bittsa turbo is a fair chunk out of the price second hand hks gt seriesor a new proven package. prices on tried and proven products are much better now than they were a couple of yrs ago. 400-450hp bolt on turbos kits such as the trust TD05SH-18g and hks equivs are selling new from around $2900- $3000 but its not just the power they make, more imortantly its the spread of power and the area under this power line which more than makes up the difference in price. all i can say is score a ride in a few different cars with differrent setups. (shops like JMS, d1GARAGE and ourselves usually have customers more than willing to show off their toys). if 210kw is where you want to stop a hybrid may well be worth it.

i too agree, i alll too often see these hybrids on customers/friends cars and they are usually dissapointing, especially as $900-1100 on some bittsa turbo is a fair chunk out of the price second hand hks gt seriesor a new proven package. prices on tried and proven products are much better now than they were a couple of yrs ago. 400-450hp bolt on turbos kits such as the trust TD05SH-18g and hks equivs are selling new from around $2900- $3000 but its not just the power they make, more imortantly its the spread of power and the area under this power line which more than makes up the difference in price. all i can say is score a ride in a few different cars with differrent setups. (shops like JMS, d1GARAGE and ourselves usually have customers more than willing to show off their toys). if 210kw is where you want to stop a hybrid may well be worth it.

With a VL turbo with t4 front wheel on my rb25 i made 213rwkw with a supra intercooler.. upgraded the cooler and upgraded to this turbo for a total cost of $2000 for a front mount and turbo to get around 250rwkw as apposed to spending $3000 on a kit then you still got no intercooler...

I just want street performance and a few runs down the strip..

Once i get the motor fixed and get it tuned we will see what she makes...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...