Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i wouldnt bother with water/meth if your running e85 as 99% of the time you reach MBT before any knock with e85. you might get some small gains from reduced temp but its nothing that couldnt be gained by simply running more boost with e85

This is a good answer I've lifted from the aquamist site explaining the cooling effect:

For more info please visit: http://www.aquamist.co.uk/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=1832

Originally Posted by Richard L

The following charts are calculated based on:

10Kg of air, Gasoline's latent heat capacity of 350KJ/Kg

Water's latent heat capacity of 2256KJ/Kg

Methanol's latent heat capacity of 1109KJ/Kg

Injection water at different ratio to fuel at 100% water and 75% Water/25% Methanol. You can see the at 100% water injection, only 3% of w/f fuel ratio is enough to replace 2.5 point of a/f ratio (dotted line). As soon as 25% of Methanol is added, the a/f ratio is dropprd to 12.0 - loosing some cooling capacity

ScreenHunter_8.jpg

Each of the following chart show a 25% percent increase in Methanol concentration of the mix.

ScreenHunter_9.jpg

ScreenHunter_10.jpg

ScreenHunter_11.jpg

lastly, just methanol is added and no water. The chart on the right is 100% water

ScreenHunter_12.jpg

The two charts show (first and last) that you will require to inject twice the amount of methanol to equal the latent heat of water alone. Methanol is relatively low cost and very effective as a coolant so what is the problem?

When higher concentration of methanol is injected, you need to lean your engines a/f ratio to accommodate the extra fuel or your engine will bog down and loose power. Consequentially - one runs the risk of putting the engine into heat stress if the supply of methanol is suddenly interrupted. Injecting water does not affect the a/f ratio. It appears that 50/50 mix has the best of both worlds.

In either cases, having a good w/a injection system with reliable "system fault" diagnostic capability is essential especially if you are running a high concentration of Methanol.

__________________

Richard L

aquamist technical support

Yes, they say there is little benefit from running E85 and WMI, NOS and propane shots seem to be the next step.

The other alternative is to run straight methanol, you lose some of the cooling effect, but gain substantially in octane numbers and power delivery. But, like all such volatile fuels the danger limits are much higher as well. Melting pistons and methanol fires, and propane explosions are mentioned. However most seem to run with either 75/25 or 50/50, methanol when mixed in these ratio's is pretty much inert. Your gasoline tank is more of a danger than a 75/25 or 50/50 mixture.

water absorbs more heat but methanol increases overall octane by a fair bit. so with straight water you have max cooling but no octane boost, with straight methanol you have a big octane boost with a bit of cooling and a few hazards. 50/50 gives the best of both and is inert, so no danger at all.

water absorbs more heat but methanol increases overall octane by a fair bit. so with straight water you have max cooling but no octane boost, with straight methanol you have a big octane boost with a bit of cooling and a few hazards. 50/50 gives the best of both and is inert, so no danger at all.

:stupid: and not so stupid at all!!!

The other advantage over e85 is that you carry WMI with you, and E85 is only in the metro areas. So if you want to go from say Melbourne to Broken Hill or Alice Springs or even Brisbane then you will not find e85 except at Sydney and then you have to look for it.

Based on my driving, I'd get 6,000km out of my 4 quart = 2.8 litre tank.

And if your stuck then you can use certain types of windscreen washer fluid, those that are 70% methanol and 30% other stuff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...