Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had read that somewhere, but couldn't justify the price for a street car, vs some spacers and bolts that cost me nothing.

Yep, I hear you.

I can get these for far less than RRP if you ever decide you want them.

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I machined up some spacers (just a thick washer really), you could use a stack of washers if you really had to. If you want I could make you some spacers out of ally, and get the bolts for you. pm if you want it.

No worries, I do the H/D Links for $135 a pair; bar prices I'm happy to PM.

Is it worth my time throwing together a fresh group buy?

If we can get 5 people to confirm their interest; I'll get one together.

Prices would be increased possibly $10-$15 per bar over my original 2011 Group buy prices.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/372067-c34-stagea-sway-bar-group-buy/

I think I spoke to you at the Putty Road cruise regarding this and was too lazy/busy to follow up. :(

Looking at sway bars for the V35 but not sure on what to go with. Factory, it has a 34mm front and 24mm rear. Considering that I can't see any larger sizes, not sure what the benefits would be?

If there are benefits, then I'd be interested in joining a GB considering if all things line up :)

I think I spoke to you at the Putty Road cruise regarding this and was too lazy/busy to follow up. :(

Looking at sway bars for the V35 but not sure on what to go with. Factory, it has a 34mm front and 24mm rear. Considering that I can't see any larger sizes, not sure what the benefits would be?

If there are benefits, then I'd be interested in joining a GB considering if all things line up :)

Hi Tony, I do remember having a chat actually!

Don't forget the OEM bars are hollow; so going to the 32mm solid front & 20mm solid rear is a huge increase in roll stiffness.

Yours I can do as a one off anytime; so when you are ready mate.

Hi Tony, I do remember having a chat actually!

Don't forget the OEM bars are hollow; so going to the 32mm solid front & 20mm solid rear is a huge increase in roll stiffness.

Yours I can do as a one off anytime; so when you are ready mate.

Of course you remember the dark guy in a SAU QLD polo rolling in a N16 Pulsar! :P

I was looking at one of the companies in the states and they had the same sizes as factory - must be solid then. Can you acquire these, and if so what dorras are we looking at? Feel free to PM me if required :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...