Jump to content
SAU Community

Lower Me !


jez NF
 Share

Recommended Posts

Right.....

I would like to see how my car would look "lowered"......not really interested in lowering the back by much....but the front needs to sit lower I feel.

COULD SOMEONE PLEASE PHOTOSHOP the said effect ^^^^ for me??

Also if its not asking for too much...could you then tell me how you did it so I can have a play

Thanks

Jeremy

med_gallery_75994_4242_68339.jpg

med_gallery_75994_4242_798292.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the height is good, any lower you'll start having problems negotiating with speed bumps and driveways

thanks man :thumbsup:

Yeah I know what all three of you are saying.....It will be a pain in the ass if I go any lower...I currently clear almost everything...and it helps coz this is a daily.

You know how u get the urge to know what its going to look like.....the bug just bit me thats all...

BUT im now sure i dont even like it "low"....so thank you for clearing that up

I love this forum...ppl respond so quickly and are so paitent with "annoying brats" like me...cheers ppl..u rock :)

OH AND....nice car charles :)

Edited by jez NF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

post-24566-0-33821600-1313409160_thumb.jpg

can someone get rid of my lift kit :yucky:

lowered suspension coming though :thumbsup:

dude this might sound stupid but are you the full owner of that photograph ? the reason why i ask is because of that logo on the bottom, i don't want some crazy ass photographer hunting me down trying to sue my socks off...anything is possible these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here u go

1st is ur stock

post-16108-0-02854800-1313352834_thumb.jpg

2nd is how it will look just basic lowering

post-16108-0-74445800-1313352886_thumb.jpg

3rd is lowered with same but bigger wheels

post-16108-0-68659100-1313352989_thumb.jpg

edit: i have no idea what the go is with the links ????? :ermm:

thanks heaps man!

yeah i like it a tad lowered like the second, will be like this when i get some adjustable coilys :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...