Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I can see through at night, however I have great eyesight

I suggest reducing your masturbation count down to once a week may improve your eyesight and you will be fine.

Ahh the normal post from someone who cant deal with the fact some one disagrees with them. Be-careful your intelligence is showing.

Oh the irony. f**k you're dumb mate.

Clearly your a bit blind either that or you cant read. I said I can see through it well enough. I never made it was the same non tinted windows.

And all of a sudden because I dont have the same opinion as you im a bender?.

I can never understand people that dont agree that have to get abusive as your self to try and make your point

clearly you don't agree that's fine say it and move on.

see thought it well enough? what well enough not to mow someone down like a cyclist that you didnt see his little LED light through your black glass? regardless of how good anyones eyesight is it isnt going to make the tint anymore transparent is it?

i never got aggressive except to say that stupid shit like this is why all the good info on SAU is lost in a pile of crap thats shovelled by yourself.

yes you are a bender, now please return to your QLD threads or even better sell any nissan branded cars you own and buy a commodore because you will fit in more on streetcommodores

who is this bender? cos his saying that with 5% of the visible light transmission at night, which means 95% of visible light is blocked out by the tint that he can see clear as day (night), i dont think Troys the one with his hand on it mate. you'll be able to see headlights and street lights and about fark all else on the street.

by the way its useless pricks like you that clog up informative threads with your bullshit. so make like a tree and faaaaaaarrrrrrrrkkkk off :action-smiley-069:

Of course no one would consider this aggressive at all, what was I thinking ??

Oh the irony. f**k you're dumb mate.

You missed your first post that started it

Whether you like it or not is one thing, I for one thought it looked awesome from the outside. Fact remains, you CANNOT see through it in either direction at night, and it's illegal. You'd be stupid to have a car that gets driven in any kind of darkness with that kind of tint on the door-windows.

Touche Trozzle

If you dont like the retort then dont start the shite.

Surely you must know that it's only text that comes through on the web not tone or emotion. If that came through we would all get on and fighting on the net would be reduced by 95%. Much like the light coming through my windows ha ha

You missed your first post that started it

Touche Trozzle

If you dont like the retort then dont start the shite.

lol, coz yeah I can see how this was starting it. Dickhead, piss off back to QLD forums and gloat your opinions there.

lol, coz yeah I can see how this was starting it. Dickhead, piss off back to QLD forums and gloat your opinions there.

Sorry I didnt realise you were a moderator and could tell people where they could and could not post.

Just because some one doesnt aggree with your opinion doesnt give you the right to spew forth abuse

Which is exactly the reason why you started this, you hypocritical fool.

EDIT: in before "Are you positively annoyed friend??". Not really, just would've thought you'd learn the first time you looked like a tool

Which is exactly the reason why you started this, you hypocritical fool.

EDIT: in before "Are you positively annoyed friend??". Not really, just would've thought you'd learn the first time you looked like a tool

Please take the time to make your posts make sense. Adding in parts you wished you had said in a previous post just makes your argument weaker than it already looks.

If you look back you will see that you called it stupid to run 5% tint straight after I said I was running it. You were suprised when I came back at you. you then threw your toys out of the bath and have been crying on here ever since.

Edited by waxracing

Please take the time to make your posts make sense. Adding in parts you wished you had said in a previous post just makes your argument weaker than it already looks.

If you look back you will see that you called it stupid to run 5% tint straight after I said I was running it. You were suprised when I came back at you. you then threw your toys out of the bath and have been crying on here ever since.

apparently that's "spewing forth abuse" in your books. I'm sorry, but I think you'll find as many people will agree that it is a quite fitting definition for stupid to filter 95% of the incoming light when the incoming light is sweet f**k all anyway. If you can't handle that fact leave, especially considering it wasn't aimed at you (as far as you know) since I too have run 5% tint on my door windows hence I know by experience IT IS STUPID. Coming back at me with a completely irrelevant insult is the definition in this thread of "starting shit".

You'll find you started the abuse buddy. I'm not prepared to have anyone here mislead to believe that 5% tint is anything but near impossible to see through at night by someone like you, only to have them cause an accident due to making the WRONG choice.

apparently that's "spewing forth abuse" in your books. I'm sorry, but I think you'll find as many people will agree that it is a quite fitting definition for stupid to filter 95% of the incoming light when the incoming light is sweet f**k all anyway. If you can't handle that fact leave, especially considering it wasn't aimed at you (as far as you know) since I too have run 5% tint on my door windows hence I know by experience IT IS STUPID. Coming back at me with a completely irrelevant insult is the definition in this thread of "starting shit".

You'll find you started the abuse buddy. I'm not prepared to have anyone here mislead to believe that 5% tint is anything but near impossible to see through at night by someone like you, only to have them cause an accident due to making the WRONG choice.

Your welcome to your own opinion

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...