Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by turbomad

Slayer, I'm using a HYBRID brand intercooler 600x300x75 is the core size, they retail for around $880. I managed 188rwkw @12psi with stock turbo and SAFC, so I can say they definately work, and there is no apparent lag from the longer intercooler pipes needed either. As far as pressure drop is concerned they  rate them a 0.5psi drop @15psi.  From memory the website was www.hybrid-developments.com.au

what shop and dyno was that done in Melbourne on?

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

By ICE at Race Pace.

Boostmeister- I don't know what you mean by the tubes are too large, have you seen some of the Apexi and HKS intercoolers, there way larger than mine, so are you saying that there no good too?

The core material looks exactly the same as the AVO item I used to have on my VL, and pretty much the same as any bar and plate cooler I've seen.

Wooo up there mate, I was not attacking you on a personal level, sorry if it came accross that way....

Is yours a Bar & Plate cooler like the ones in their magazine adds? Most of the Jap ones are not B&P but are tube and fin and there for the tube size is a different matter. What I was saying was that the ones I have seen from HYBRID in the B&P config have really open tubes running through the core, this is why a cooler that size has so little pressure drop. I think AVO use the same cores (Garrett truck B&P cores) so you are right in saying they look the same. Its not how they look from the outside but how in internals are constructed and whether they are really open or not.

Internally the tubes have fins (if that's the correct term) just like the fins you can see on the outside that connect the tubes together. I got mine off a guy on the forums who had a quick GTR built by HYBRID and was able to get them for $700, I hardly believe that by paying $2000 I would make more power, and remember 90% of Skylines would never see 15psi or 200rwkw+ so why try to sell them an intercooler that would be better suited to a 600hp GTR. The $1300 saving can be spent on ECU mods, EBC etc.. which is a must otherwise the $2000 intercooler is a waste of time anyway.

$1100 sounds cool (if thats fitted and piped) but who do I use here in Perth to source a cooler and fit it for that price?

I am getting tired of looking, and thinking the ARE option as complete kit that the guys reckon is straight forward to fit (literally bolt on, one piece of metal needs to be cut on one side of the bumper) is the pick... I can be sure its efficient and properly sized, fully HPC coated piping and quality fittings, and a BOV pumb point welded in for a trubosmart type II or III.

As I see it, the main upgrades to gain good power are (in my opinion):

- Airpod and associated cold air duct and box

- turbo-back exhaust system (ideally with seperated wastegate section)

- front mount intercooler

- BOV (less lag between gearshifts)

- replacement ECU and integrated EBC (PowerPC and boost module)

If I can keep the costs of the exhaust, intercooler and ecu down to a minimum I can save a heap of dosh... but I have my concerns about some of these cheap intercooler kits, and I really want a Hitech exhaust (they rock!!), and the PowerFC seem the logical pick if you want an all-in-one package with boost control and good drivability.

So the end result is I need to spend in excess of $6K to get that kind of setup :D

Help! ;)

Originally posted by slayer

I am getting tired of looking, and thinking the ARE option as complete kit that the guys reckon is straight forward to fit  (literally bolt on, one piece of metal needs to be cut on one side of the bumper) is the pick... I can be sure its efficient and properly sized, fully HPC coated piping and quality fittings, and a BOV pumb point welded in for a trubosmart type II or III.

As I see it, the main upgrades to gain good power are (in my opinion):

- Airpod and associated cold air duct and box

- turbo-back exhaust system (ideally with seperated wastegate section)

- front mount intercooler

- BOV (less lag between gearshifts)

- replacement ECU and integrated EBC (PowerPC and boost module)

So the end result is I need to spend in excess of $6K to get that kind of setup :)

Help! :D

As far as 'main' upgrades for power, I would drop the BOV off the list, it's a 'rice accessory' and unless you buy a plumb-back type you will make less power thanks to throwing the ecu out on air flow. but hey if going slower is your thing to have that "psssh" sound. They don't decrease lag over the stock one BTW.

Keep the Greddy intercooler as an option, it's a true bolt on and as well made as any/better than most (especially if you save a few hundred over the ARE ). ($1600)

Pod filter? cross that bridge when you buy an upgraded turbo, I have a panel filter(k&N) and it flows more than enough for the stock turbo. You pocket the extra $200 the pod and air box will cost over a K&N panel and put it towards something that will add more performance for the money.($100)

Replacement ecu wise you could get an e-manage to start off with in its s-afc form ($405) then add the E-01 boost control($800) later on and presto a full ignition and fuel map to play with with data logging you can store on SDRAM cards even! Before you get the E-01 you could just get the $100 bleed type bc.

Add $1300 on the full exhaust, $200 on a malpassi rising rate, $250 on a bigger fuel pump and a standard bearing T3/T4 hybrid for $1200.

You'll be over the 200rwkw mark then.

I am going to get a tube and fin core from PWR in queensland, a 600x300x75 core is only $585, then I just need to fabricate some end tanks, many people use these cores to great success.

I hope by using a big tube and fin core The cooling will be as effective as a bar and plate core with less restriction.

Slayer,

You could try talking to Lumpy at C-Red. They do get a bit of 2nd hand gear in as well as having pretty good prices on new gear, eg new 3" stainless cat back for $990 fitted. Lumpy and the guys down there are quite free with the advice and don't mind giving you some time to discuss your power needs and work out a long term/short term plan. I highly recommend them.

Rev210, Steve - Thanks for the info.

I am adding the fuel pump and malpassi to the mod list now :)

200kw is a nice round figure, I will chase that (was shooting for about 180rwkw, will see how I go)

I will speak to the guys at C-Red see what they can do.

Thanks guys

Conrad

If your only looking for 180rwkw then really your only an intercooler and SAFC away. I'm getting 188@12psi, will tune it to 14psi and if I can't get 200 then I'll change turbo's.I've only spent $1700 so far and $450 was on a EBC which I could've done cheaper with a bleed.

Originally posted by turbomad

If your only looking for 180rwkw then really your only an intercooler and SAFC away. I'm getting 188@12psi, will tune it to 14psi and if I can't get 200 then I'll change turbo's.I've only spent $1700 so far and $450 was on a EBC which I could've done cheaper with a bleed.

What make/model of EBC was that for $450 and how is it?

Originally posted by slayer

Hi guys, anyone here had any experience with a Greddy Intercooler?

The guys at PerfectRun have the kits very cheap compared to say HKS, Apexi or even local kits like ARE or SubZero.

For a  R33 running a stock turbo ( potentially wil hi-flow it later) and PowerFC with boost controller, exhaust and intake mods whats the pick?  

I dont want to limit my options too much in the future in terms of of flow rate, and I don't think I will be going the route of new injectors, fel pump and turbo (well if my girlfriend has anything to say on it :D ) so I think a responsive intercooler will be better than a monstrous power handler that has high pressure drop.

Comments?

well, plus $300 postage from JP..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...