Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They are self cleaning, when the engine is shut off the sensor wire burns hot to get rid of oil and crap that has accumulated on it. Not a good idea to excessively clean them manually.

did you ask them to do it, or did they just do it for you and charged you for it? if the latter, might just be their way to get a few extra dollars out of you.

also, what filters are you running? if it's an oiled air filter then there might be too much oil in it and it's making them a bit oily.

I monitored the voltage from my AFMs they show around 900mv then drop to 500mv to 400mv while driving causing the car to stop suddenly before coming back to 900mv which is not at an optimal running level, but I am still able to drive the car around, The mechanics either did not check the millivoltage on my AFMs or did not clean them as I wanted in my original first visit to their garage, I did not want my AFMs to be cleaned a second time as I had to diagnose the problem my self and from the long list of things I have already replaced (Turbos, Fuel pump, Injectors, Coil packs, new air filters, Spark plugs) it wasn't hard (even for a amateur like myself) to link the symptoms (stalling, hesitating acceleration) to the AFMs and recognize they need to be replaced.

To have them cleaned a second time in such a short space of time when I said I was replacing them with brand new nismo units is not acceptable as I never asked for them to be cleaned “again” they just did it and then rang me to say they've cleaned my afms again and said theres no problem with the car....So if I didn't know any better I would believe/trust them drive away and later find out and be baffled when the car starts stalling and hesitating again....Thankfully I am an experienced mechanic..Not

Got some more info on AFMs,

damaged AFM may lead to increased fuel consumption and increased pollutant emissions as well as decreased power and throttle response (I was only getting 250km to a tank)

The engine may fail to ignite, causing misfire and a large increase in unburned hydrocarbon HC emissions

Lean mixtures burn hotter and may cause rough idle, Hard starting and stalling, And can damage the catalytic convertor (I had some of my cat come out while I was on lakeside raceway)

or burn valves in the engine

The risk of spark knock/engine knocking (detonation) is also increased when engine is under load

Forced induction engines can be catastrophically damaged by burning too lean for too long

The leaner the air/fuel mixture, the higher the combustion temperature is inside the cylinder

Too high a temperature will destroy an engine- melting pistons and valves

So if anyone is experiencing any or all of these things its your AFMs, I have also been told that if your AFMs need cleaning then they are already on their way out and should be replaced. Cleaning might might make it run better for a while but its going to play up again sooner or later. Its much safer just to replace it, a faulty AFM will destroy an engine quick smart

Edited by TommyR34

So if anyone is experiencing any or all of these things its your AFMs, I have also been told that if your AFMs need cleaning then they are already on their way out and should be replaced. Cleaning might might make it run better for a while but its going to play up again sooner or later. Its much safer just to replace it, a faulty AFM will destroy an engine quick smart

Whooah, slow down there.

Spraying the element with contact cleaner is hardly going to damage the element. If you are using an oiled filter that is over oiled then cleaning regularly is pretty simple insurance. If you are having ongoing issues with your AFM the most common reason is poor connections where they are soldered.

If you take the lid off the AFM and re-solder the connections (which is a 30-60 minute job for a noob) you can sort out the vast majority of AFM probs for not much effort. Certainly cheaper than spending $80-100 for a second hand one potentially with the same issues or >$300 on a new one.

I used a Power FC hand controller to monitor the airflow mv, let it idle for about 5minutes, went from 1200 1100mv when I first start the car, then after 5minutes dropped to 900mv and then was randomly dropping down to 500mv 400mv mark at which point almost stalling, Really does help to do research

The AFM has a voltage reading, can be seen by the PowerFC hand controller and no doubt Consult.

It's not the airflow reading you need to go off either.

It's the actual voltage. If it's stalling then the sensor for the AFM1 or AFM2 will actually show up as having failed.

I never clean my AFMs regularly. Once a year tops. Just use some degreaser and then heaps of water to wash it out.

Works fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...